Teams

4-AJarvis-CHTC

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-28vs 1-KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDestiny Lopez / Lizzy Burch vs Ana Goodwin / Allison Pack1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Chaves Cerdas / Colleen Starns vs Lora Alkhawam / Kelly Jernigan2-6, 1-6
2023-09-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesColleen Starns / Destiny Lopez vs Amanda Laird / Pamela Howell-Davis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Bateman / Lizzy Burch vs Thuy Brooks / Stacy Price3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-07vs 1-KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDestiny Lopez / Colleen Starns vs Melinda Duncker / Kim McWhorter3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLizzy Burch / Eve van Buren vs Valerie Michael / Ana Goodwin1-6, 0-6
2023-08-31vs 6-LBible-UNCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Lizzy Burch vs Alison Sweeney / Patsy Park6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Griffiths / Colleen Starns vs Heba Salama / Suzanne Carroll Woodard6-0, 6-0
2023-08-24vs 3-JYoung-Eno 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLizzy Burch / Lori Bateman vs Adrianne Charleston / Olga Ryzhikova1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesColleen Starns / Destiny Lopez vs Liz Schaller / Shannon Bartle7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-17vs 5-ACombs/LLong-CCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesLizzy Burch / Suzie Roth vs Allison Oshea / Stephanie Terrey2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesColleen Starns / Amber Jarvis vs Dongbo Lu / Jennifer Harrell7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.05
Mary Griffiths
published
2.98
Lizzy Burch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.85
Destiny Lopez
published 3
2.77
Suzie Roth
published
2.48
Colleen Starns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
published
2.38
Laura Chaves Cerdas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Jarvis + Colleen Starns224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Jarvis
90W–54L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
Mary Griffiths
29W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Lizzy Burch
44W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Destiny Lopez
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Suzie Roth
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.77
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%55%45%
2.48
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
Laura Chaves Cerdas
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
0%81%19%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.