Teams

JDeConto-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-25vs PDavis-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Erin McMurtrey1-6, 6-7
2025-11-17vs LKulp-SVCLost 12
L#1 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Laura Gallaher2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Alexander Klein vs Lisa Simmons1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesThuy Brooks vs Michele Peters4-6, 3-6
2025-11-04vs MLong-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesBeth Dingler vs Kelsey Mortimore6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesThuy Brooks vs Sterling Ingui6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAmanda Alexander Klein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-28vs TCrowley-CHTCLost 01
L#1 SinglesBeth Dingler vs Lisa Baxter4-6, 4-6
2025-10-21vs LMalahias-SVCWon 20
W#2 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Sarah Tuttle6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesThuy Brooks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-14vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesBeth Dingler vs Andrew Moon7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Kylie Herst6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Erica Shirts
published
3.01
Julie DeConto
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.90
Beth Dingler
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.90
Amanda Alexander Klein
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Chelsea Donahue
published 3
2.72
Thuy Brooks
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thuy Brooks + Beth Dingler5746% games+0.8% vs expected
Amanda Alexander Klein + Julie DeConto12854% games+0.6% vs expected
Beth Dingler + Julie DeConto5261% gamesnot enough data
Thuy Brooks + Amanda Alexander Klein3360% gamesnot enough data
Thuy Brooks + Julie DeConto224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Shirts
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Julie DeConto
145W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Beth Dingler
115W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Amanda Alexander Klein
66W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Chelsea Donahue
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Thuy Brooks
78W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.