Teams

Winner/Veltri - Gonzalez/Contrera

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Yrma Petersen vs Julie Jurman / Liz Sobel1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRaegan Hanson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-12-10vs Midtown - NickosonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Kerri Paul vs Julie Jurman / Liz Sobel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA vs Patricia Williams6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRaegan Hanson / Ana Carolina Manchester vs Lissette Loddo / Nicole Banzer3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesZorayda Hidalgo / Yrma Petersen vs Lainie Rudolph / Jodi Skolnick7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-12-03vs Veltri - Chen/TorresWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Samie Lesperance vs Patricia Sarmiento / Lory Strickland6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAna Carolina Manchester / Garbine de la Mora vs Jodi Crespi / Teri DiGiulian7-5, 6-2
2021-11-18vs Veltri - Chen/TorresWon 41
W#1 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Elizabeth Smalley vs Silvia Fonseca / Silvina Peloso6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesGarbine de la Mora vs Evelyn Daniels6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesZorayda Hidalgo / Samie Lesperance vs Jodi Crespi / Teri DiGiulian6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA vs France Gaudreau6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSara Contreras / Sally Hernadez vs Yonghong Chen / Patricia Sarmiento3-6, 3-6
2021-10-08vs Midtown - NickosonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Kerri Paul vs Maria Moreno / Sarah Nickoson4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA vs Nicole Banzer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGarbine de la Mora / Elizabeth Smalley vs Lainie Rudolph / Andrea Tarud7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSara Boidi / Sally Hernadez vs Jodi Skolnick / Maria Schaeuffler2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-09-24vs Veltri - Chen/TorresWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Sigal Sasson vs Jodi Crespi / Evelyn Daniels3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA vs Yonghong Chen7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGarbine de la Mora / Kerri Paul vs Claudia Torres / Delia Bolanos6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Samie Lesperance
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Natalia Frantsevskaya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Garbine de la Mora
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.74
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.67
Audrey Gayle
published 4
3.66
Zorayda Hidalgo
published
3.58
Sigal Sasson
published
3.41
Raegan Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Sally Hernadez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Kerri Paul
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Camille Aponte
published 3.5
3.11
Elizabeth Smalley
published 3.5
3.03
Yrma Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Sara Contreras
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalia Frantsevskaya + Samie Lesperance10555% games+8.6% vs expected
Garbine de la Mora + Samie Lesperance12556% games−4.6% vs expected
Yrma Petersen + Sara Contreras5845% games−8.2% vs expected
Kerri Paul + Garbine de la Mora7255% gamesnot enough data
Kerri Paul + Natalia Frantsevskaya044 matchesnot enough data
Yrma Petersen + Sally Hernadez123 matchesnot enough data
Kerri Paul + Samie Lesperance303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Samie Lesperance
247W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Natalia Frantsevskaya
169W–134L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Garbine de la Mora
284W–129L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA
147W–107L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Ana Carolina Manchester
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Audrey Gayle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Zorayda Hidalgo
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Sigal Sasson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Raegan Hanson
87W–55L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Sally Hernadez
66W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Kerri Paul
281W–174L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Camille Aponte
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elizabeth Smalley
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Yrma Petersen
122W–116L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
Sara Contreras
20W–28L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.