Teams

Beerman Sassy Smashers - R. Espitia

2023 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Laurie Grieger vs Tracey Ritter / Nathaly Arredondo5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-30vs Polk/T. Love/40&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Teresa Osborn4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rogers / Ginger Davis vs Tiffany Love / Leslie Simmons7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Volkmann / Svetlana Darrow vs Sandra Campisi / Shannon Miles6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesGinger Davis / Jennifer Rogers vs Geraldine Tardy / Debra Edwards6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKATHERINE FOLSOM / Ginger Davis vs Clara Copley / Kandy Wood6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-25vs Polk/T. Love/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Senita Hanif vs Tiffany Love / Leslie Simmons4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rogers / Ginger Davis vs Sheryl Norman / Kerrie Hall6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Lamanda Petcoff6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Mary Stine6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRegina Espitia / Ginger Davis vs Jennifer Payne / Geraldine Tardy5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Allison Sorenson
published 3.5
2.96
Ginger Davis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.80
Senita Hanif
published
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
published
2.74
Svetlana Darrow
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Regina Espitia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Davis + Svetlana Darrow213 matchesnot enough data
Senita Hanif + Regina Espitia033 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Grieger + Regina Espitia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Sorenson
96W–39L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Senita Hanif
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Svetlana Darrow
86W–95L career · 12 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
Regina Espitia
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.