Teams

C 7.5M MM1 Londhe

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-16vs C 7.5M MM2 ViswanathanWon 30
W#1 DoublesWill Schultz / Lohit Abhay Kumar vs Chris Reutepohler / Avinash Prasad3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Roche / Abe Waziri vs Louis Burnoski / Venkatraman Arakoni6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSaleem Chowdhry / Kyle Hougland vs Hazem Nouraldin / Ragupathi Sundararaj6-1, 6-2
2025-10-24vs C 7.5M PW KarasWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeremy Bryan / Venkat Rama Varanasi vs David Fleischer / Kevin Dieterich6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWill Schultz / Suhas Londhe vs Nick Karas / H Michael Wiant6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSaleem Chowdhry / Muhammad Rana vs Miguel Romero / Albert Stasek2-6, 4-6
2025-10-10vs C 7.5M MM2 ViswanathanWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuboor Jamal / Kyle Hougland vs Louis Burnoski / Venkatraman Arakoni6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWill Schultz / Venkat Rama Varanasi vs Chris Reutepohler / Ragupathi Sundararaj7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Roche / Abe Waziri vs KHAJA SHAIK / Venkateswaran Kadirvelu6-1, 6-4
2025-09-19vs C 7.5M PW KarasWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuboor Jamal / Venkat Rama Varanasi vs David Rickard / Andy White4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Lundy / Lohit Abhay Kumar vs Kent Dinchman / Altan Dinchman6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNishant Singh / Kishore Devarakonda vs Mark Osoteo / Colin Fishbaugh6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 7.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Matthew Roche
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Jeremy Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
Jax Currington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Will Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
3.74
Andrew Kraig
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Suboor Jamal
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.70
Christopher Fantauzzo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Nishant Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Saleem Chowdhry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Kyle Hougland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Abe Waziri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.41
Jeffrey Polcar
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Venkat Rama Varanasi
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.29
Vivek Mehta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Lohit Abhay Kumar
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.22
Muhammad Rana
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Kishore Devarakonda
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Suhas Londhe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suboor Jamal + Will Schultz12166% games+19.6% vs expected
Kishore Devarakonda + Nishant Singh4252% games+18.3% vs expected
Kishore Devarakonda + Will Schultz8165% games+13.5% vs expected
Venkat Rama Varanasi + Nishant Singh6455% games+7.3% vs expected
Suboor Jamal + Nishant Singh3256% games+7.3% vs expected
Jax Currington + Andrew Kraig5065% games+6.9% vs expected
Lohit Abhay Kumar + Nishant Singh3844% games+6.1% vs expected
Suboor Jamal + Jeremy Bryan2448% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Roche
19W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.02
Jeremy Bryan
42W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
Jax Currington
38W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
Will Schultz
119W–35L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.83
4
Andrew Kraig
49W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Suboor Jamal
61W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
4
Christopher Fantauzzo
32W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Nishant Singh
66W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.66
Saleem Chowdhry
35W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Kyle Hougland
47W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Abe Waziri
25W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Jeffrey Polcar
68W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Venkat Rama Varanasi
54W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Vivek Mehta
47W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Lohit Abhay Kumar
77W–72L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Muhammad Rana
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Kishore Devarakonda
68W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Suhas Londhe
46W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.