Teams

FH Sweetspots - C. Deming

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesCarol Guido / Jesse Glassford vs Tina Sturdevant / Nikki Spirakis5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-27vs Hills/T. Hartigan/18&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesGinger Anzalone / Tammy Hohman vs Kathy Skonieczny / Amy Schnackenberg1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Amy Quinn / Amy Parmer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-20vs FishHawk Matchmakers - N. EvansWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Guido / Jesse Glassford vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Collier / Tammy Hohman vs Debra Campos / Erin Posey6-3, 6-0
2023-02-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesGinger Anzalone / Carol Guido vs Lala Todorovic / Barbara Heineken6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCarol Guido / Giselle Miller vs Nicole Gomez / Jennifer Sawyer6-2, 6-0
2023-01-23vs TYCC Yachty By Nature - L. DavittWon 10
W#3 DoublesTammy Hohman / Susan MOSHER vs Shannon Roark / Mary Beth Courier6-3, 6-3
2023-01-09vs PC Dashing Divas - J. HolbrookWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Rose Coulton / Ginger Davis6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jesse Glassford
published
3.20
Kelly Powell
published
3.17
Carol Guido
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.15
Ginger Anzalone
published 3.5
3.13
Tammy Hohman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Melissa Collier
published
2.95
Carrie Deming
published 3.5
2.92
Melissa Wolczak
published
2.82
Susan MOSHER
published
2.72
Giselle Miller
published 3
Monica Eiermann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Hohman + Carol Guido3654% games+5.7% vs expected
Giselle Miller + Kelly Powell134 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Anzalone + Jesse Glassford123 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Glassford + Kelly Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Glassford
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Kelly Powell
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–216L career · 9 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ginger Anzalone
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Tammy Hohman
77W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melissa Collier
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Carrie Deming
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Melissa Wolczak
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Giselle Miller
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Monica Eiermann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.