Teams

Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs RISE AC-GlinesLost 03
L#1 Female SinglesMarcela Pomadoro vs Amy Johnson4-6, 2-3
L#2 Female DoublesMegan Rusconi / Lisa OBrien vs Stacey Cahoon / Jessica Olsen1-6, 2-6
L#3 Female DoublesCathy Mclevish / Elaine Zuckerman vs Nikki Mower / Mary Menlove3-6, 3-5
2023-12-07vs Sunpro-Leishman/MortensenWon 21
W#1 Female SinglesMarcela Pomadoro vs Raquel Westover6-4, 2-3, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesMegan Rusconi / Cathy Mclevish vs Katrina Harlan / Melanie Hall1-6, 2-6
W#3 Female DoublesJill Brown / Sherree Greenhalgh vs Kelly Mortensen / DeeAnn Edwards6-2, 7-6
2023-11-30Won 20
W#1 Female SinglesFaith Petersen vs Kymball Ellis7-5, 4-2
W#3 Female DoublesCathy Mclevish / Marcela Pomadoro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-16vs Ivory Ridge-Holland/JarvieLost 13
L#1 Female DoublesFaith Petersen / AMy Huish vs Nicole Holland / Emily Jarvie5-7, 3-2, 0-1
W#1 Female SinglesMarcela Pomadoro vs Angela Bleak6-3, 6-3
L#2 Female DoublesLisa OBrien / Megan Rusconi vs Jana Fairbanks / Nanette Brockbank3-6, 5-6
L#3 Female DoublesRenae Brooks / Sherree Greenhalgh vs Trista Willardson / Lisa Bullington4-6, 4-6
2023-11-09vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesTricia Mavrinac / Megan Rusconi vs Susan Groesbeck / Kim Santiago0-6, 6-7
W#1 Female SinglesFaith Petersen vs Sherilyn Rawlings7-6, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesRenae Brooks / Sherree Greenhalgh vs Valerie Blackhurst / Kimberly Mayfield3-6, 2-6
2023-11-02vs RISE AC-GlinesWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesCarol Molesky / Marcela Pomadoro vs Sara Johnson / Becky Thompson7-5, 1-4, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesFaith Petersen vs Michele Halls6-4, 1-4, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesRenae Brooks / Elaine Zuckerman vs Elizabeth Geldmacher / Nikki Mower6-7, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RISE AC-Glines6017719179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen5117718188
3Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek5117720167
4Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner4218616161
5Sports Mall-Affleck42141025199
6Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry3315924186
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33101431196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24101433225
9Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie24101433227
10Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen1561837227
11Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen1551939252
12Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton0651941246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Marcela Pomadoro
usually #1 Female Singles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Faith Petersen
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Carol Molesky
published 4
3.56
AMy Huish
published 4
3.43
Renae Brooks
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Sherree Greenhalgh
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Cathy Mclevish
published 3.5
3.21
Megan Rusconi
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Elaine Zuckerman
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lisa OBrien
published
Melanie Vickroy
published
Patricia Kipp
published
Tricia Mavrinac
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Rusconi + Renae Brooks191748% games+3.5% vs expected
Cathy Mclevish + Carol Molesky5455% games+3.3% vs expected
Cathy Mclevish + Megan Rusconi0941% games+0.2% vs expected
Patricia Kipp + Marcela Pomadoro1450% games+0.2% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Renae Brooks345245% games−1.6% vs expected
Megan Rusconi + Lisa OBrien264644% games−2.6% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Cathy Mclevish91642% games−5.3% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Megan Rusconi2445% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marcela Pomadoro
135W–82L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Faith Petersen
100W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Carol Molesky
21W–30L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
AMy Huish
84W–63L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
3.56
4
Renae Brooks
96W–129L career · 3 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
4
Sherree Greenhalgh
90W–159L career · 3 lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Cathy Mclevish
41W–85L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Megan Rusconi
73W–127L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Elaine Zuckerman
16W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Lisa OBrien
30W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Vickroy
31W–79L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Kipp
17W–44L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tricia Mavrinac
15W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.