Teams

SFV - Ace High

2025 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · Spring

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-27vs SFV - Ace QueensLost 02
L#2 SinglesKaren Clancy vs Sara Herta1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSara Israel vs Judith Ortiz4-6, 5-7
2025-04-19vs SFV - LLW- PPB/ChuLost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Pai vs Wendy Correa1-6, 4-6
2025-04-06vs SFV - LLW- PPB/ChuWon 21
W#1 SinglesEmily Pai vs Sara Lee5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaren Clancy vs Christine Chu2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSarena Ahmad vs Wendy Correa2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-03-09vs SFV - Shot GirlsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarena Ahmad vs Veronica Garcia3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKaren Clancy vs Alexis Alcantar6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Emily Pai
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Jennifer Haber
published 3
Claire Torok
published 2.5
Karen Clancy
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Sara Israel
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Sarena Ahmad
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Pai
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Jennifer Haber
74W–64L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
2.5
Claire Torok
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Clancy
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Israel
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarena Ahmad
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.