Teams

KY/LOU/MCGLONE/WESTFAUL

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.0 Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.78 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-25vs KY/LOU/THOMPSON/HOMRICHWon 41
L#1 DoublesHan Cho / John Osborne vs Alden Homrich / Matthew Stewart3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBen Straus vs Ben Birkby6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlbert Stobbe / Tyler Westfaul vs Jeremy Thompson / Brian Warren6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAbraham O'Coffey vs Eric DeMunbrun6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeremy Huff / Adam Kirby vs Danny Byrd / Teddy Groton6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Cedric Boutin
published 4
3.80
Tyler Westfaul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
John Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Albert Stobbe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ben Straus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Abraham O'Coffey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Ben Hinds
published 4
3.58
Billy McGlone
published 3.5
3.56
Han Cho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Noah Allgeier
published
3.40
Brian Belva
published 3.5
3.38
Charles Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jonathan Hahn
published
3.33
Justin Powers
published
3.31
Adam Kirby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Kevin Keehan
published
3.25
Eddie Goodman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeremy Huff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Goodwin + Billy McGlone2343% gamesnot enough data
John Osborne + Han Cho224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cedric Boutin
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Tyler Westfaul
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
John Osborne
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Albert Stobbe
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Ben Straus
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Abraham O'Coffey
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Ben Hinds
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Billy McGlone
15W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Han Cho
28W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Noah Allgeier
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Brian Belva
23W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Charles Goodwin
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jonathan Hahn
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Justin Powers
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Adam Kirby
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kevin Keehan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Eddie Goodman
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Jeremy Huff
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.