Teams

Cheval - A. Aldeen

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-17vs TYCC - G. ColdironLost 02
L#1 SinglesRay Eckstein vs Edward Peterson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Arndt / Amer Aldeen vs Samuel Biller / Kevin Platt2-6, 0-6
2022-05-26vs Buckhorn - J. TorresLost 01
L#1 SinglesRay Eckstein vs Mark Kanarek5-7, 2-6
2022-05-15vs HILLS - Davis Island - M. DixonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRay Eckstein / Kevin Trinh vs Greg Estroff / Michael Sagafi7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2022-05-14vs HCC - C. MacculloughLost 01
L#3 DoublesVijay Paul / Craig Arndt vs Matt Laccabue / Richard Sobieray6-7, 1-6
2022-04-23vs TYCC - G. ColdironLost 01
L#3 DoublesRay Eckstein / Mike Delamere vs RICHARD CASEY / AUGUSTO SOLANO1-6, 4-6
2022-04-16vs Buckhorn - J. TorresLost 02
L#2 DoublesKevin Trinh / Ray Eckstein vs Ricardo Ramirez / James Mason4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Whitney / Craig Arndt vs Chris Thomas / Paul Zack4-6, 1-6
2022-04-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Arndt / Ray Eckstein vs Gregory Hebard / Justin Milne3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Craig Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.03
Felix Tromp
published 4.5
3.90
Andrew Roig
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Amer Aldeen
published 4
3.75
Peter Marsocci
published
3.71
Ray Eckstein
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Jason Crow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Roig + Amer Aldeen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Arndt
65W–40L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Felix Tromp
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Andrew Roig
57W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Amer Aldeen
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Peter Marsocci
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Ray Eckstein
64W–82L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Jason Crow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.