Teams

Aloha Smash

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-10vs Warrior PrincessLost 01
L#1 DoublesSatsuki Morales / Yoko Engelhardt vs Dayna Luka / Jordyn Tanaka5-7, 1-6
2025-08-02vs Tri WaitLost 01
L#1 DoublesHitomi Yokoyama / Satsuki Morales vs Kate MacKeigan / Yoshie Groves1-6, 1-6
2025-07-26vs Pair-adise CityWon 10
W#1 DoublesHitomi Yokoyama / Satsuki Morales vs Colleen Defreitas / Kimberly Tamashiro6-2, 6-2
2025-07-20vs TyakiLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkiko Jung / Karen Ng vs Mirei Kwak / Shoko Burkett0-6, 1-6
2025-07-13vs Lei’d Back LadiesLost 01
L#1 DoublesYoko Engelhardt / Karen Ng vs Hannah Bautista / Kaori Ogawa3-6, 5-7
2025-07-12vs OC Just2PlayWon 10
W#1 DoublesAkiko Jung / Karen Ng vs Karen Lar Rieu / Lydia Yabsley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-06vs AiyaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkiko Jung / Yoko Engelhardt vs Noelle Chun / Erin Jyo0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Warrior Princess7070145
2Aiya6161550
3Tyaki4343648
4Tri Wait4343760
5Pair-adise City3434866
6Aloha Smash25251174
7OC Just2Play16161278
8Lei’d Back Ladies16161279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connie Doma
published 3.5
3.13
Yoko Engelhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Hitomi Yokoyama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Akiko Jung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Satsuki Morales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Akiko Jung + Hitomi Yokoyama3356% games+10.5% vs expected
Satsuki Morales + Hitomi Yokoyama3645% games+5.2% vs expected
Satsuki Morales + Akiko Jung4445% games+0.6% vs expected
Satsuki Morales + Connie Doma404 matchesnot enough data
Yoko Engelhardt + Hitomi Yokoyama123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Connie Doma
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yoko Engelhardt
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Hitomi Yokoyama
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Akiko Jung
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Satsuki Morales
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.