Teams

6 KRAKrushers - Garitz

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-05vs 10 ACAC - AdkinsLost 03
L#1 SinglesStacey Hill vs Anna Holloway2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKate Garitz vs Jeanne Sarmento4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKatie Smith vs Tyler Hunt0-6, 1-6
2025-11-03vs 1 HCC GarnerLost 03
L#1 SinglesTiffany Clarke vs Kathryn Horsley2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesStacey Hill vs Meghan Hale2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesLissa Gupton vs Kaitlin Levin3-6, 2-6
2025-10-27vs 8 Woodlake - Schiavone CorraziniLost 02
L#2 SinglesLissa Gupton vs Deborah Thexton4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesNicole Bridge vs Susan Burkett2-6, 3-6
2025-10-15vs 5 Westwood GeeLost 03
L#1 SinglesKate Garitz vs Lauren Connor1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLuiza Bretas vs Mary Gee1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKatie Smith vs Amanda Stamper0-6, 0-6
2025-10-06vs 3 Chestnut Oaks - Coyle 2.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesStacey Hill vs Katie Rose6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNicole Bridge vs Tracey Morris6-0, 6-0
2025-10-01vs 4 Ridgetop Pugh SinglesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLuiza Bretas vs Lauren Timms6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesNicole Bridge vs Kerrissa MacPherson0-6, 1-6
2025-09-22vs 15 Stonehenge ZambitoWon 21
W#1 SinglesTiffany Clarke vs Lexie Zambito6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLissa Gupton vs Andrea Doyle6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKatie Smith vs Jenny Zubey7-5, 6-0
2025-09-15vs 13 Magnolia Green SheldonWon 21
L#1 SinglesTiffany Clarke vs Jennifer Conrad2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKate Garitz vs Melissa Scalese6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLuiza Bretas vs Stephanie Hoag6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Stacey Hill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.50
Kate Garitz
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.41
Tiffany Clarke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.05
Katie Smith
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
1.95
Nicole Bridge
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Lissa Gupton
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Luiza Bretas
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Garitz + Tiffany Clarke314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Hill
32W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Kate Garitz
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Tiffany Clarke
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Katie Smith
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Nicole Bridge
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Lissa Gupton
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luiza Bretas
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.