Teams

Refund

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · Hold

8 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Hold have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Anna Tomkins
published 4.5
3.86
Leigh Barter
published 4
3.33
Karen Johnston
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jeanie White
published 3.5
3.01
Dr Amy Linder
published
2.82
Ashley Noble
published 3
2.63
Marc Morriston
published 3
Chris Pereira
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
3.5
Karen Johnston
259W–106L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Jeanie White
131W–130L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Dr Amy Linder
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Ashley Noble
34W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Marc Morriston
17W–43L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Chris Pereira
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.