Teams

Carmeli-Biggs/40/6.5/SC

2023 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Daysi Valencia
published 3.5
2.95
Alison Beebe
published 3
2.93
Kellie Rhea
published
2.92
Cathy West
published 3
Caroline Allen
published 3
Jamie McWilliams
published
Jennifer Magness
published
Kelly Slimming
published
Kim Osborn
published
Kimberly Darr
published
Melinda Carmeli
published
Nancy Hewitt
published
Pamela Schroeder
published
SHELLY GALLARDO
published
Sally Dane Sperry
published
Susan Livaudais
published
Suzanne Roy
published
Tracy Pourciau
published
Trisha Rovira
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Darr + Alison Beebe10656% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Schroeder + Kim Osborn5852% gamesnot enough data
Daysi Valencia + Kimberly Darr6063% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Hewitt + Cathy West1437% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Magness + Tracy Pourciau134 matchesnot enough data
Kim Osborn + Tracy Pourciau224 matchesnot enough data
Daysi Valencia + Kelly Slimming404 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Kelly Slimming134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daysi Valencia
55W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
3
Alison Beebe
54W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kellie Rhea
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Cathy West
37W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Caroline Allen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jamie McWilliams
29W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Magness
8W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
43W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Osborn
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
46W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda Carmeli
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Hewitt
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Schroeder
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Dane Sperry
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Livaudais
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Roy
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Pourciau
44W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trisha Rovira
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.