Teams

CTL18/Wilson/GV

SC Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles Women - 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
Woodcreek Club
Sep 19 9:00 AM
Greenview Park
2026-08-29vs CTL18/Green/PKLost 12
L#1 SinglesMonica Tyson vs Kimberly Adams3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJanet Sullivan vs Judith Ray6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesNatalie Cobbs vs Talisa Kupfer0-6, 4-6
2026-08-22vs CTL18/TOLER/SEPWon 21
W#1 SinglesMonica Tyson vs Shelley Kriegshaber6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMya Wilson vs Jenny Maxwell6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesReka Corley vs Janis Caccamise4-6, 4-6
2026-08-15vs CTL18/URIARTE/WFLost 12
W#1 SinglesKiya Davis vs Cortney Carlson6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Regan vs Madison Pickrel0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMya Wilson vs Julie Murphy4-6, 1-2
2026-08-08vs CTL18/Green/PKWon 30
W#1 SinglesShirley Godfrey-Jackson vs Sara Smith6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKamaria Baxter vs Kimberly Adams6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLakesha Jeffries vs Cheyenne Jones6-1, 6-0
2026-08-01vs CTL18/TOLER/SEPWon 20
W#1 SinglesMya Wilson vs Kelly Glynn6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLakesha Jeffries vs Jessica Price6-1, 6-1
2026-07-28vs CTL18/URIARTE/WFWon 30
W#1 SinglesJanet Sullivan vs Madison Pickrel7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKamaria Baxter vs Cortney Carlson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesReka Corley vs Beth Fletcher6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-11vs CTL18/Green/PKLost 12
W#1 SinglesShirley Godfrey-Jackson vs Adrianne Green6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMary Miranda vs Sara Smith4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Regan vs Talisa Kupfer6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Singles Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL18/Wilson/GV3211410105
2CTL18/Green/PK236919144
3CTL18/TOLER/SEP1431224160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Shirley Godfrey-Jackson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Lakesha Jeffries
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.91
Kiya Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Reka Corley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Elizabeth Regan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Janet Sullivan
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.82
Monica Tyson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Mya Wilson
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.61
Kamaria Baxter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Mary Miranda
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Angela Clyburn
published 2.5
2.46
Amy Malcom
published 2.5
2.43
Natalie Cobbs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Tyson + Natalie Cobbs3255% gamesnot enough data
Reka Corley + Mya Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Monica Tyson + Angela Clyburn044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirley Godfrey-Jackson
114W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Lakesha Jeffries
44W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Kiya Davis
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Reka Corley
35W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Elizabeth Regan
48W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Janet Sullivan
83W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Monica Tyson
84W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Mya Wilson
31W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Kamaria Baxter
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.61
Mary Miranda
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%25%75%
2.59
2.5
Angela Clyburn
46W–51L career · no lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Amy Malcom
28W–63L career · no lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Natalie Cobbs
32W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.