Teams

LBK Public Gleason Perfect Combo

2023 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 7.5 W Wednesday

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-20vs Smart Doubles Payne ParkLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Adams / Helen Turner vs JoMarie Privitera / Svetlana Abrams4-6, 4-6
2023-11-08vs LBK Public Levy 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHelen Turner / Irene Langlois vs Erin Neufelder / Cassandra McPike6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-10-25vs Sarasota/Romano/50&Over7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Martha Talyor vs Carrie Boyd / Natalie Bloch7-5, 6-1
2023-10-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Martha Talyor vs Debbie Mays / Jet Sagalow7-5, 6-4
2023-10-11vs Smart Doubles Payne ParkSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Martha Talyor vs Regina McLaughlin / Cecile Wooster6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Goodwin / Helen Turner vs Linda Evans / Jo Anne Cullen2-6, 5-7
2023-10-09vs Sarasota/Romano/50&Over7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesHelen Turner / Lisa Adams vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Susan Gillis3-6, 4-6
2023-10-04vs LBK Public Levy 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesHelen Turner / Lisa Adams vs Bettye Sykes / Erin Neufelder7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Mary Jane Waite
published
3.37
Helen Turner
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Molly Gleason
published
3.06
Christine Goodwin
published 3.5
3.02
Ann Kelmenson
published 3.5
Irene Langlois
published
Jackie Gibbins
published
Margaret Stanton
published
Peggy Lavallee
published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Schonhoff + Helen Turner2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Helen Turner
34W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Molly Gleason
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christine Goodwin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Ann Kelmenson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Irene Langlois
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jackie Gibbins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Stanton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peggy Lavallee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.