Teams

RVR GOLD

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - ASPEN · MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-03vs HOMELost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Rubino / Nancy Harris vs Lise Lorentzen Carnes / Susi Livran1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-24vs BASALTLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Keleher / Kimberly Welsh vs Ashley Richardson / Adele Melnick4-6, 3-6
2022-09-19vs GSCC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Keery / Tami Cassetty vs Kate McRaith / Meghan Hegberg7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Rubino / Alicia Keleher vs Lisa Rue / Lisa Bentley6-0, 6-2
2022-09-12vs CROWNSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTami Cassetty / Diane Boat vs Judi Simecek / Kelly Capri6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLeslie Keery / Kimberly Welsh vs Vivian Williams / Andrea Olson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-29vs RVR REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesTami Cassetty / Leslie Keery vs Susan Blizzard / Olivia Emery7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-22vs GSCC WHITESplit 11
W#1 DoublesTami Cassetty / Amy Filiss vs Jenell Hilderbrand / Sasha Enewold4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Rubino / Jennifer Hamilton vs Shannon Francis-Pienaar / Michele Derosa1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RVR GOLD5111718150
2GSCC WHITE4211718130
3BASALT238714129
4RVR RED0631532213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Diane Boat
published 3.5
Alicia Keleher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Filiss
published 3.5
3.11
Leslie Keery
published 3.5
2.96
Kimberly Welsh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Tami Cassetty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Rubino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Filiss + Leslie Keery5161% games+5.6% vs expected
Diane Boat + Amy Filiss4456% games−2.8% vs expected
Tami Cassetty + Leslie Keery51246% games−6.1% vs expected
Amy Filiss + Tami Cassetty224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Boat
65W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Alicia Keleher
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Filiss
41W–31L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Leslie Keery
30W–46L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kimberly Welsh
21W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Tami Cassetty
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.96
Kimberly Rubino
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.