Teams

PY Rhodes WSL A18-3.0W

2026 WMI WSL Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI WSL A18&O 3.0 W (8 player)

16 players · average NTRP 2.86 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-12vs PTC Quist WSL A18-3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesCarrie Hewitt / Jing Cai vs Natalie Bernecker / Kerri Davis2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEliska Schnabel vs Jasmine Comer-Cage6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCathy Musselman / Lynda Rhodes vs Lynne Bass / Kate MacGuidwin4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRebecca Durant vs Volita Vinoski6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Alcaraz / Josette Gatchalian vs Barbara Lynn Freedman / Michelle Hodsdon0-6, 3-6
2026-05-22vs MVS McMahon WSL A18-3.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesDeborah Magers / Lynda Rhodes vs Tracy Missad / Jennifer Stares6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEliska Schnabel vs Stephanie Jesin6-3, 5-4
L#2 DoublesJess Ciaravino / Larison Hendrick vs Rita Rodriguez / Jennifer Costa6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlenda VanStratton / Carrie Hewitt vs Stacy Maloney / Emily MacK3-6, 1-6
2026-05-15vs WH Miller WSL A18-3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesDeborah Magers / Rebecca Durant vs ROSEANN BLAHNIK / Susan Bailey4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesEliska Schnabel vs Laura Britain2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLynda Rhodes / Carrie Hewitt vs Anna Clement / Mara Matison6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJing Cai vs Maureen Owens3-6, 5-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Musselman / Cindy Anderson vs Shannon Denison / Lisa Barr2-6, 5-5
2026-05-01vs COE Witherill WSL A18-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynda Rhodes / Belinda McDougal vs Mary Bratschi-VanWieren / Rosemary Sheets3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEliska Schnabel vs Julie Taiber6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJing Cai / Josette Gatchalian vs Melody Werner / Lisette Poletes0-6, 5-7
2026-04-03vs MVH Hildebrand WSL A18-3.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesJess Ciaravino / Cindy Anderson vs Alice Zlotucha / Jane VanderMeer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBelinda McDougal vs Lindy Scripps0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJosette Gatchalian / Lynda Rhodes vs Hope VandenTop / Jen Tingey3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGlenda VanStratton / Cathy Musselman vs Beth Rix / Dawn Hildebrand0-6, 0-6
2026-03-13vs WH Rockhill WSL A18-3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesLynda Rhodes / Jess Ciaravino vs Renee LaCoss / Connie Kamerling4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesEliska Schnabel vs Torrey Lapine4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Guy / Cathy Musselman vs Christina Menta / Laura Mrozinski1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBelinda McDougal vs Sarah Rockhill6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJing Cai / Cindy Anderson vs Joan VanSickler / Astrid Goldenbeld2-6, 4-6
2026-02-06vs MVC Miller-Heys WSL A18-3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesRebecca Durant / Lora Krone vs Linda Miller-Heys / Beth Miller3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJing Cai vs Amanda Chassee1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLynda Rhodes / Josette Gatchalian vs Leia Vos / Melanie Kalisz2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLarison Hendrick vs Megan Brickner2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJess Ciaravino / Karen Alcaraz vs Jennifer Meeks / Veronica Harbach3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WMI WSL A18&O 3.0 W (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVS McMahon WSL A18-3.0W6126924250
2MVC Miller-Heys WSL A18-3.0W61241127266
3PTC Quist WSL A18-3.0W52211432265
4COE Witherill WSL A18-3.0W34191636279
5WH Miller WSL A18-3.0W34161941311
6WH Rockhill WSL A18-3.0W34152042315
7MVH Hildebrand WSL A18-3.0W25112452345
8PY Rhodes WSL A18-3.0W0782757367

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Eliska Schnabel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Durant
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.85
Lynda Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #2 Singles 31% · published
2.80
Mary Lou Guy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Belinda McDougal
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.76
Larison Hendrick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Cindy Anderson
published 3
2.74
Deborah Magers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Carrie Hewitt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Jess Ciaravino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Lora Krone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Jing Cai
usually #2 Singles 20%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.22
Karen Alcaraz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Cathy Musselman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Josette Gatchalian
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.03
Glenda VanStratton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynda Rhodes + Rebecca Durant2546% games+6.0% vs expected
Belinda McDougal + Rebecca Durant2445% games+2.3% vs expected
Deborah Magers + Carrie Hewitt3648% games−2.5% vs expected
Larison Hendrick + Jess Ciaravino1536% games−9.7% vs expected
Lynda Rhodes + Josette Gatchalian21134% games−14.2% vs expected
Lora Krone + Rebecca Durant0723% games−14.8% vs expected
Lora Krone + Josette Gatchalian01213% games−18.3% vs expected
Lora Krone + Belinda McDougal2442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eliska Schnabel
19W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Rebecca Durant
21W–58L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lynda Rhodes
45W–102L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Mary Lou Guy
34W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Belinda McDougal
23W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Larison Hendrick
5W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Cindy Anderson
28W–43L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Deborah Magers
32W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Carrie Hewitt
29W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Jess Ciaravino
6W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Lora Krone
18W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jing Cai
5W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
Karen Alcaraz
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.22
2.5
Cathy Musselman
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Josette Gatchalian
14W–81L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.19
2.5
Glenda VanStratton
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.