Teams

Sh.Roberts18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-13vs Ba.Yusuf18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesNate Wireback / Taylor Atherton vs Eduardo Schlotterhausen / Youngjun Lee1-6, 2-6
2024-05-12vs La.Williams18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesHunter Ryno / Nate Wireback vs Paul Brinckerhoff / McLean Warren6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-07vs Ev.Fultz18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesTaylor Atherton / Nate Wireback vs Brent Townsend / James Wu6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheldon Roberts / Jacob Nelson vs Kyle Faltisco / Patrick Graney6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-31vs Br.Lamm18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesHunter Ryno / Nate Wireback vs Reece Desonglo / Noah Yao1-6, 3-6
2024-03-17vs Ro.Brown18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesNate Wireback / Hunter Ryno vs John Markham / John Vander Vennet0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSheldon Roberts / Jacob Nelson vs Edwin Braswell / Willi Hayes6-4, 6-4
2024-03-10vs Ad.Whitesell18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesTaylor Atherton / Hunter Ryno vs Gary McAuliffe / Brett Berra2-6, 1-6
2024-03-03vs Er.Moritz18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesTaylor Atherton / Liam O'Boyle vs Jeff Abercrombie / Emanuele Michi2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheldon Roberts / Manan Desai vs Philip Gugliotta / Mitchell Wolborsky4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNate Wireback vs Nevin Shrimanker6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Nate Wireback
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.64
Sheldon Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.61
Taylor Atherton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
3.18
Michael Alderman
published
3.12
Hanzhang Liu
published
3.10
Hunter Ryno
published
Ryan Madison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Atherton + Sheldon Roberts7264% games+9.1% vs expected
Taylor Atherton + Nate Wireback6260% games+6.9% vs expected
Nate Wireback + Sheldon Roberts314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Alderman + Hanzhang Liu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nate Wireback
95W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.70
3.5
Sheldon Roberts
63W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Taylor Atherton
77W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
Joseph Hollingsworth
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
Michael Alderman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Hanzhang Liu
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Hunter Ryno
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Ryan Madison
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.