Teams

BC-MCC/EricSmith

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-06vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TonyHsuLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Scott Brown vs Francesco Nguyen / Kyle Vo1-6, 3-6
2024-06-09vs BC-PVTC/PeterMalishkaLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Radden / Scott Brown vs William Konya / Joshua Chou2-6, 4-6
2024-05-11vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TonyHsuLost 01
L#1 DoublesSimon Peters / Andrew Radden vs Nicholas de Goede / Davis Kop6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-04vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Brown / Andrew Radden vs Dalton Coon / Juan Tueros6-1, 6-2
2024-04-27vs BC-Kramer/JoePiccirilloWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Jason Manasse vs Brian Beach / Wade Murphy7-6, 6-3
2024-04-20vs BC-IndpendencePark/RafaeelHerreraLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Scott Brown vs Rafael Herrera / Jonathan Chen7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2024-04-13vs BC-PVTC/PeterMalishkaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Ross Wooldridge vs Kurt Kredel / Edward Charles4-6, 4-6
2024-04-06vs BC-WestEnd/KeithOshiroLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Ross Wooldridge vs Dominic Juneau / Evan Mobley4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Simon Peters
published
4.28
Andrew Radden
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
Abe Wong
published 4.5
4.24
Jason Manasse
published
4.16
Ross Wooldridge
published
4.15
Henry Coia
published
4.10
Nick Darrow
published
3.98
Steven Anderson
published
3.56
Matt Witherell
published
John J Cochran
published
John Ziegler
published
Remco Waller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Radden + Jason Manasse3343% games−7.8% vs expected
Ross Wooldridge + Simon Peters213 matchesnot enough data
Henry Coia + Steven Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Simon Peters
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Andrew Radden
67W–56L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Abe Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jason Manasse
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Ross Wooldridge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Henry Coia
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
4.15
Nick Darrow
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
Steven Anderson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
Matt Witherell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
John J Cochran
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Ziegler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Remco Waller
35W–36L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.