Teams

T bar M/O'Brien-O'Grady W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-28vs High Point/Sealy-Friend W3.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesAndrea Perryman / Sharon Jester vs Clara Hernandez / Shanna Claytor4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Raindl vs Miyoung Kim6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTara OGrady / Ann Hochman vs Janice Norton / Nancy Benso6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Henry / Lexie Aderhold vs Charlotte Balke / Dorothy Esh1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-02-26vs Stonebriar/Boyd-Smith W3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Cate / Christine Marlowe vs Joy Cruse / Carrie Francis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Hochman / Tara OGrady vs Alyssa Maxson / Cari Zurlis6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Logan / Alison Stone vs Sara Kremin / Amy Titus3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 DoublesChristine Marlowe / Andrea Perryman vs Kathleen Nuytten / Diane Lanzone6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Obrien / Ann Hochman vs Amy Hilliard / Krissy Zylka5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-01-31vs Lakes @ CH/SpringerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Perryman / Lorena Tolle vs Christina Norrie / Theresa Premjee6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnn Hochman / Christine Marlowe vs Kristin Rogers / Sharon Sykes3-6, 4-6
2025-01-24vs Stonebridge/Graham-Martinson W3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Marlowe / Andrea Perryman vs Cindy Graham / Aubrey Kennedy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErin Obrien / Sharon Jester vs Dianne Dolly Reid / Lea Ellsworth0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLexie Aderhold / Alison Stone vs Jennifer Griffiths / Carrie Martinson5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Hayley Podesta
published
3.12
Tara OGrady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Christine Marlowe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Danielle Raindl
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.04
Andrea Perryman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Danielle Cate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Allison Brodnax
published 3
2.81
Katherine Weeks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.79
Ann Hochman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Sharon Jester
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Alison Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lorena Tolle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Henry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayley Podesta + Andrea Perryman5066% gamesnot enough data
Christine Marlowe + Andrea Perryman224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Hochman + Tara OGrady303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hayley Podesta
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Tara OGrady
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Christine Marlowe
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
3
Danielle Raindl
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Andrea Perryman
16W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Danielle Cate
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Allison Brodnax
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Katherine Weeks
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Ann Hochman
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Sharon Jester
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
2.5
Alison Stone
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.58
Lorena Tolle
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Henry
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.