Teams

Jacelone, Marcia

2023 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 9.0 Combo - Women - 55

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-25vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLara Maple / Leslie Addadi vs Renee Steffes / Jennifer Hill6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeb Danaher / Diane Kakareka vs Kelly Eastwood / Jackie Gehrke7-6, 5-3
2023-06-17vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbi Davis / Gretchen Evans vs Jennifer Hill / Renee Steffes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Crampton / Diane Kakareka vs Jill Waldman / Anne Hope3-6, 2-6
2023-06-10vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeb Danaher / Debbi Davis vs Aimee Claassen / Pamela Kopplin1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSara Armer / Mindy Stewart vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Jennifer Hill3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Kakareka / Theresa Montgomery vs Jackie Gehrke / Anne Hope4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-04vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMindy Stewart / Susan Doerr vs Kelly Eastwood / Jackie Gehrke3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Montgomery / Kimberly Gandy vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Anne Hope2-6, 2-6
2023-06-03vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLara Maple / Leslie Addadi vs Anne Hope / Jill Waldman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesApril Austin / Diane Kakareka vs Valerie Marks / Renee Steffes0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDebbi Davis / Sara Armer vs Aimee Claassen / Pamela Kopplin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-20vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Manning / Leslie Addadi vs Aimee Claassen / Pamela Kopplin1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLara Maple / April Austin vs Kelly Eastwood / Jackie Gehrke3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSara Armer / Gretchen Evans vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Jennifer Hill2-6, 0-6
2023-05-07vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesLara Maple / Leslie Addadi vs Valerie Marks / Kelly Eastwood7-6, 2-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLyla Flohrs / Theresa Montgomery vs Jill Waldman / Anne Hope0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebbi Davis / Ann Crampton vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Renee Steffes5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Combo - Women - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Diane Kakareka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Sara Armer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Susan Doerr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
April Austin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Leslie Addadi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Deb Danaher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Mindy Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Debbi Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Theresa Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Lara Maple
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Lyla Flohrs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Marcia Jacelone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Ann Crampton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gretchen Evans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberly Gandy
published
Nancy Manning
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Montgomery + Lyla Flohrs5851% games−6.9% vs expected
Lyla Flohrs + Ann Crampton5067% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Addadi + Lara Maple134 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Montgomery + Ann Crampton314 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Addadi + Mindy Stewart033 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Jacelone + Sara Armer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane Kakareka
36W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
Sara Armer
94W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
Susan Doerr
109W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
4
April Austin
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Leslie Addadi
43W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Deb Danaher
81W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
Mindy Stewart
42W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.60
4
Debbi Davis
70W–46L career · 8 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Theresa Montgomery
50W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lara Maple
109W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
Lyla Flohrs
68W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Marcia Jacelone
49W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ann Crampton
51W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Gretchen Evans
17W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Gandy
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Manning
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.