Teams

Team 9 RBGCC 6.5

2023 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-30vs Team 2 Dare DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMario Levine / Andrea Henningsen vs Nathan Bergman / Stephanie Wright7-6, 4-3
2023-10-15vs Team 1 High RollersLost 01
L#2 DoublesAbby Colucci / James Colucci vs Tara Jefferson / Raman Batish5-7, 2-5
2023-10-08vs Team 8Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Henningsen / Nick Pittelkau vs Joanna Schindler / Jacob Sultan0-6, 1-6
2023-10-01vs Team 7 Great Falls of FireLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Henningsen / Jie Shi vs Tara Reynolds / Marc Sendich1-6, 2-6
2023-09-17vs Team 5 PiF 6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAbby Colucci / James Colucci vs Angela Boone / Charles Boone2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Paige Bartlett
published
3.30
Andrea Henningsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Mario Levine
published
2.88
Abby Colucci
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Marybeth Wootton
published
2.73
Larisa Caicedo
published
2.72
2.67
Hazel Geary
published 3
2.65
James Colucci
published 3
2.61
Marisa Daley
published
Jie Shi
published
John DeMoors
published
Kate Wesley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Bartlett
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Andrea Henningsen
60W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Abby Colucci
53W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Marybeth Wootton
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Larisa Caicedo
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
26W–25L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Hazel Geary
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
3
James Colucci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Marisa Daley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Jie Shi
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John DeMoors
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Wesley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.