Teams

CC - LLWx - SLOCC Net Ninjas

2026 USTA CC Spring Adult 18 & OVER · CC USTA 3.0W 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesTessa Kotch / Alicia Iqbal vs Leslie Warwick / Martha Calderon6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesValerie Fu vs Teresa Klostermann4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Hall / Christian Stearns vs Ramona Cabiles / Jennifer Manduffie1-6, 0-6
2026-06-18vs CC Avila SainsburyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Iqbal / Valerie Fu vs Megan Kostelnik / Cherie Charbonneau6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGenevieve Arjal / Tessa Kotch vs Amber Petit / Sarah Jones6-1, 6-1
2026-06-17vs CC Avila SainsburyWon 10
W#1 SinglesTessa Kotch vs Meghan Stone2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Quibell / Sydney Ereno vs Natasha Mercurio / Paloma Dandurand6-0, 6-3
2026-06-11vs CC SLOCC Miss HitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Quibell / Lauren Bordeman vs Leela Sherbon / Arianna Fasse6-1, 6-0
2026-05-14vs CC SLOCC Miss HitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGenevieve Arjal / Tessa Kotch vs Megan Haupt / Sarah Haupt6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLauren Bordeman / Valerie Fu vs Ramona Cabiles / Susan Pruett6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSydney Ereno / Christian Stearns vs Tracy Nelson / Trish Ross2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTessa Kotch vs Amanda Balogh6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Gresser / Megan Humpal vs Marty Nitzberg / CoAnn Weil7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · CC USTA 3.0W 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CC - LLWx - SLOCC Net Ninjas7118614137
2CC - LL2 - Sinsheimer - Line Kissers - SLO edition6216820183
3CC Avila What’s Love Got to do with IT2691534251
4CC SLOCC Miss Hits2671737258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Lauren Bordeman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.14
Genevieve Arjal
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.09
Michelle Quibell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Valerie Fu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Sydney Ereno
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Tessa Kotch
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Cindy Gresser
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Alicia Iqbal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carlee Starkey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Christian Stearns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Megan Humpal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shelle Ball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sierra Hulin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tessa Kotch + Sydney Ereno2444% games+0.7% vs expected
Cindy Gresser + Sydney Ereno4249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Bordeman
18W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.24
3
Genevieve Arjal
9W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
Michelle Quibell
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
Valerie Fu
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Sydney Ereno
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tessa Kotch
21W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Cindy Gresser
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Alicia Iqbal
11W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Carlee Starkey
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Christian Stearns
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Humpal
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shelle Ball
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sierra Hulin
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.