Teams

LTC:Beaulieu/Sterling

2024 WMA Tri-Level Fall (2024) · 3.5 Women 1

3 players · average NTRP / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-26vs BOUS:AndrettaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarie Sattler / Louise Sterling vs Laurie Andretta / Linda Babich6-7, 2-3
2024-11-22vs ETC:SNS:SanfordLost 01
L#1 DoublesMoira Donoghue / Louise Sterling vs Lori McMahon / Mona Swanson6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2024-11-19vs ETC:Love All: KavanaghLost 01
L#1 DoublesMoira Donoghue / Louise Sterling vs Jessica Kavanagh / Jana Roberts3-6, 4-6
2024-11-15vs ETC:Weida/PhilbinWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarie Sattler / Moira Donoghue vs Laurie Philbin / Erica Weida6-3, 6-4
2024-11-09vs LTC:Queen of the Courts:DesrochesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMoira Donoghue / Marie Sattler vs Ellen Donnelly / Noreen Desroches6-2, 6-1
2024-11-03vs ETC:Doubles Vision:MacCollLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarie Sattler / Louise Sterling vs Michele Kunitz / Michelle Foard2-6, 3-6
2024-11-03vs LTC:United Nations:Maher/HoagWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarie Sattler / Louise Sterling vs Anita Hoag / Anya Martin6-4, 6-5
2024-10-23vs LTC:DareDoubles:StauberWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Sterling / Moira Donoghue vs Valerie Stauber / Lisa Riel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Doubles Vision:MacColl8080355
2ETC:Love All: Kavanagh7171457
3ETC:SNS:Sanford6262867
4LTC:Beaulieu/Sterling4444972
5LTC:United Nations:Maher/Hoag35351171
6LTC:Queen of the Courts:Desroches35351182
7LTC:DareDoubles:Stauber35351276
8BOUS:Andretta17171484
9ETC:Weida/Philbin17171585

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Moira Donoghue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Marie Sattler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Louise Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Moira Donoghue + Louise Sterling12756% games+7.0% vs expected
Marie Sattler + Louise Sterling71144% games+0.2% vs expected
Marie Sattler + Moira Donoghue8750% games−2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Moira Donoghue
68W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Marie Sattler
79W–98L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Louise Sterling
127W–135L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.