Teams

Rutledge/LR/Rebs

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-01-12vs Clark/LR/RebsLost 02
L#1 SinglesMelaney Gee vs Hannah Lewis2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTiffanie Taylor vs Morgan Bridgforth2-6, 1-6
2026-01-06vs Junior/LR/RebSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAutumn Hemphill vs Katelyn Lazenby7-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesTiffanie Taylor vs Denise Allen-Duff5-7, 3-5
2025-12-11vs Sullivan/Overley/LR/CCLRSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMelaney Gee vs Maeghan Overley6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRobin Reed vs Hannah Rabinowitz2-6
2025-12-10vs Clark/LR/RebsLost 03
L#1 SinglesCarmen Scruggs vs Hannah Lewis1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrittany Richardson Watson vs Molly Murdock1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTiffanie Taylor vs Anna Catherine Cargile3-6, 4-3
2025-12-04vs Brown/LR/RebSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAutumn Hemphill vs Abby Barr6-3, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMelaney Gee vs Kharyssa Brown6-4, 6-1
2025-11-18vs Junior/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesTiffanie Taylor vs Katelyn Lazenby4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCarmen Scruggs vs Lynn Stone6-4, 3-3
L#3 SinglesRobin Reed vs Hope Rider6-7, 1-2
2025-11-13vs Sullivan/Overley/LR/CCLRWon 21
W#1 SinglesCarmen Scruggs vs Olivia Ramsey6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMelaney Gee vs Sydney Ross6-2, 7-5
L#3 SinglesTiffanie Taylor vs Elizabeth Blackshaw4-6, 3-6
2025-11-06vs Brown/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesAutumn Hemphill vs Abby Barr5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMelaney Gee vs Anna Morshedi7-5, 6-3
L#3 SinglesTiffanie Taylor vs Erika Johnson0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Clark/LR/Rebs327816131
2Sullivan/Overley/LR/CCLR3381021162
3Rutledge/LR/Rebs1781630231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Brittany Richardson Watson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Melaney Gee
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Carmen Scruggs
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Autumn Hemphill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Robin Reed
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Tiffanie Taylor
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
2.71
Katie Rutledge
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffanie Taylor + Katie Rutledge303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brittany Richardson Watson
31W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Melaney Gee
35W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Carmen Scruggs
13W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Autumn Hemphill
29W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Robin Reed
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Tiffanie Taylor
17W–38L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Katie Rutledge
23W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.