Teams

Davis/Handelman

2025 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.06 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-11vs Cornelius - Corn ChaosSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAndrea Lemgruber Viol / Deanna Jezek vs Chenchen Feng / Jocelyn Lin2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Greenwood / Nancy Trimble vs Barbara Braffett / Helen Chao5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-24vs Zack - ManorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDeanna Jezek / Chung Kim vs Ashley Johnson / Christina Shioutakon5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Greenwood / Kathleen Eder vs Denise Plude / Melissa Galloway6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChung Kim / Deanna Jezek vs Archella Dorsey / Vy Nguyen4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDeanna Jezek / Alison Smith vs Sheila O'Connell / LeeAnn Talbott2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChung Kim / Nancy Trimble vs Ruxandra Badiu / Kara Sun5-7, 1-6
2025-10-27vs Dentoni - WildcatsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Donaldson / Deanna Jezek vs Carina Villagra / Beth Gregory6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJustine Handelman / Kathleen Eder vs Mia Dentoni / Sandra Murcia1-6, 4-6
2025-10-19vs Cornelius - Corn ChaosWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Donaldson / Kathleen Eder vs Adrienne Allen / Jane Davenport6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Davis / Nancy Trimble vs Kerry Mustico / Sara Zalowitz6-0, 7-5
2025-10-11vs Kau - Honey DeuceLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Trimble / Wendy Wasserman vs Nicole Ifill / Stacey White1-6, 1-6
2025-10-02vs Zack - ManorWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustine Handelman / Kathleen Eder vs Melissa Galloway / Karen Dugan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Catherine Donaldson
published 3.5
3.06
Kathleen Eder
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Nancy Trimble
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Angela Sharma
published 3
2.90
Deanna Jezek
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.84
Alison Smith
published 3
2.84
Nancy Davis
published
2.76
Susan Greenwood
published
2.73
Justine Handelman
published
2.70
Helen Mahoney
published 3
2.69
Chung Kim
published 3
2.56
Shelley Moeller
published
2.52
Mariechen Bresler
published
2.13
Donna Westervelt
published 2.5
2.11
Wendy Wasserman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chung Kim + Susan Greenwood3264% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Davis + Mariechen Bresler134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Trimble + Donna Westervelt033 matchesnot enough data
Chung Kim + Nancy Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Donaldson
47W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3
Kathleen Eder
80W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 6 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Deanna Jezek
39W–38L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Alison Smith
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Nancy Davis
16W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Susan Greenwood
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Justine Handelman
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Helen Mahoney
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Chung Kim
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Shelley Moeller
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Mariechen Bresler
6W–22L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Donna Westervelt
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Wendy Wasserman
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.