Teams

Mangialardi/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 55 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-28vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Mangialardi / Kirsten Coleman vs Michelle Reyzer / Jeanine Dyer4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Lester / Cynthia Walker vs Veronica Pulley / Angie Howard6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Keller / Jennifer Comegna vs Karen Vasil / Amy Hirt2-6, 2-6
2025-06-07vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Mangialardi / Kirsten Coleman vs Jeanine Dyer / Michelle Salada3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Lester / Joy Murphey vs Mary Fetherling / Stephanie Dunkle4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Keller / Julia Miller vs Nancy Allan / Amy Hirt4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Michelle Hamman
published
3.75
Lora Fox
published
3.56
Stacy Thomas
published
3.56
Wendy Mangialardi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kirsten Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Kelly Arney
published
3.36
Joyce Quirk
published
3.21
Joy Murphey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Jessica Lester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Rebecca Bourlakas
published
2.87
Mary Craft
published
Dawn Keller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Jennifer Comegna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Hamman
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Lora Fox
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Stacy Thomas
11W–22L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Wendy Mangialardi
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Kirsten Coleman
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Kelly Arney
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Joyce Quirk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.36
Joy Murphey
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Jessica Lester
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.16
Rebecca Bourlakas
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Mary Craft
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Dawn Keller
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Comegna
13W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.