Teams

SSLT RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-01vs SSLGT ORANGEWon 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Girard / Lindsey Markley vs Peggy Seyfert / Adriana Buonassisi6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulia Bridgewater vs Diem Phan-Boyer6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Phillips / Annie Karr vs Jill Hanafee / Kristy Marocchi7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesErin Conley vs Tina Francis6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClaire Ehrlich / Lourdes Calderon vs Andrea Lawson / Kristen Padberg6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-25vs CK BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesAnnie Karr / Jill Phillips vs Natasha Vissering Hutter / Megan Abeyta5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Bridgewater vs Katherine Richey5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Robin Yaple / Amber McGregor3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesErin Conley vs Melissa Doyle1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClaire Ehrlich / Jennifer Girard vs Carla Bidwell / Jordan Campbell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-19vs LTFC BLACKLost 23
L#1 DoublesTara Sonenstein / Alisa Phelps vs Lori Benson / Barb Hedges2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Bridgewater vs Elizabeth Bendalin3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLindsey Markley / Jennifer Girard vs Maribeth Hanzlik / Kristin Paulsen6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesErin Conley vs Melissa Griese6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesClaire Ehrlich / Cynthia Vander Pol vs Carol Jochens / Rebecca Pulick6-7, 3-6
2021-05-12vs SSLGT REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Paige Burke / Cindy McLemore3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJulia Bridgewater vs Shiela Enser1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Vander Pol / Lindsey Markley vs Toni Hipp / Adrienne Wilson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJaffe Biederman / Lourdes Calderon vs Kate James / Victoria Rozelaar-Ferrell6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-04vs KC WHITELost 23
W#1 DoublesTara Sonenstein / Lindsey Markley vs Sarah Schumaker / Susan Jeffries6-0, 5-4
L#1 SinglesJulia Bridgewater vs Laura Kannaka5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnnie Karr / Lourdes Calderon vs Terri Parzybok / Leslie Garson-Wright7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesErin Conley vs Sophia Vukovich2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJaffe Biederman / Cynthia Vander Pol vs Debbie Stevenson / Karen Engel4-6, 3-6
2021-04-27vs SSH GREENLost 05
L#1 DoublesAlisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein vs Amy Hand / Dusty Fitzgerald4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Bridgewater vs Brittney Ricci4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Phillips / Annie Karr vs Susan Marshall / Susan Hoelscher4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesErin Conley vs Gloria Gonzalez3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJaffe Biederman / Cynthia Vander Pol vs Kathy Anselmo / Michele Cunningham3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annie Karr
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Cynthia Vander Pol
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Erin Conley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Julia Bridgewater
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Alisa Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Tara Sonenstein
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Claire Ehrlich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jaffe Biederman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Janelle Coughran
published
Jennifer Girard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jill Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lindsey Markley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lourdes Calderon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janelle Coughran + Jaffe Biederman201155% games+5.3% vs expected
Lindsey Markley + Alisa Phelps1841% games−6.9% vs expected
Alisa Phelps + Tara Sonenstein62538% games−8.1% vs expected
Jill Phillips + Annie Karr1736% games−12.9% vs expected
Lindsey Markley + Tara Sonenstein224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Markley + Cynthia Vander Pol123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Annie Karr
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Cynthia Vander Pol
28W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Erin Conley
12W–18L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Julia Bridgewater
60W–64L career · 6 lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Alisa Phelps
46W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.03
Tara Sonenstein
9W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Claire Ehrlich
32W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jaffe Biederman
27W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
Janelle Coughran
31W–29L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jennifer Girard
27W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jill Phillips
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindsey Markley
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lourdes Calderon
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.