Teams

Team Ford

2023 Coppermine Combo Mixed · Coppermine Combo Mixed 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.07 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-20vs Team NelsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Cady / Jennifer Exelby vs April Braxton / Calvin Braxton II6-4, 6-1
2023-07-18vs Team NelsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJean Acuna / Gregory Selby vs April Braxton / Calvin Braxton II1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Cheng / Eboni Lance vs Courtney Hercenberg / Anirudh Sridharan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-12vs Team NelsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Exelby / Justin Cady vs Katie Tetrault / DONALD CRAWLEY7-6, 6-0
2023-07-07vs Team NelsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGregory Selby / Jean Acuna vs Donald Lewis / Jill Rose6-4, 6-3
2023-06-29vs Team NelsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJean Acuna / Gregory Selby vs Jonathan Ramos / Courtney Hercenberg6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPaul Edwards / Eboni Lance vs Lesley Tompkins / Walter Parrish7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-26vs Team NelsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJean Acuna / Gregory Selby vs Jill Rose / Donald Lewis6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEboni Lance / Paul Edwards vs Terri Mrozinski / Jonathan Ramos3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Vicki Williamson
published
4.37
Anthony Carle
published 4.5
4.20
Gregory Selby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.75
Justin Cady
published
3.72
Jennifer Exelby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
3.69
Jean Acuna
published
3.59
Kimberly Ford
published
3.42
Daniel Bryant
published 3.5
3.30
Gil Myers
published 3.5
3.05
Paul Edwards
published
Karen Robertson
published
Nancy Der
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Ford + Gil Myers7168% games+28.4% vs expected
Eboni Lance + Gregory Selby5358% games+4.3% vs expected
Vicki Williamson + Daniel Bryant134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
357W–214L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.38
Vicki Williamson
44W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Anthony Carle
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Gregory Selby
56W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Justin Cady
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jennifer Exelby
95W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Bethany Henderson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Jean Acuna
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Kimberly Ford
55W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Daniel Bryant
27W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Gil Myers
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Paul Edwards
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Karen Robertson
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Der
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.