Teams

WNCB Weinland (HRC)

Adult 65 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 65 & O 3.5 women Wed morning

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-16vs WNCW Page (Peachtree)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaurean Adams / Cathy Childress vs Janet Eury / Susan Tomkin2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Carson / JoAnne Dougher vs Ronda Champion / Wanda Page2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Peggy Sanders / Barbara Weinland vs Jae Kim / Ann McAndrews3-6, 4-6
2025-04-04vs WNCW Page (Peachtree)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Childress / Heather North vs Alice Robbins / Susan Fitzmaurice2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaurean Adams / Claudia Gavin vs Ann McAndrews / Donna Connell6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGay Anderson / Liz Carson vs Wanda Page / Betty Hollingsworth6-7, 5-7
2025-03-26vs WNCW Page (Peachtree)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPatti Griffith / Margaret Peggy Sanders vs Janet Eury / Susan Tomkin6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoAnne Dougher / Gay Anderson vs Susan Fitzmaurice / Alice Robbins0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarlene Rau / Barbara Weinland vs Ann McAndrews / Jane Alexander Bell4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & O 3.5 women Wed morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Kristy Owens
published
3.15
Claudia Gavin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Gay Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Heather North
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Margaret Peggy Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
JoAnne Dougher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Barbara Weinland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Marlene Rau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maurean Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patti Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gay Anderson + Heather North5456% games+7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Owens
16W–33L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Claudia Gavin
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15
3
Gay Anderson
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Heather North
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Margaret Peggy Sanders
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
JoAnne Dougher
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Barbara Weinland
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Marlene Rau
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Maurean Adams
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Griffith
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.