Teams

Jo.Nance55M3.5

2026 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-21vs Sh.Lav55MLost 01
L#1 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Julian Barnes vs Jeff Abercrombie / Susan Hembarsky3-6, 3-6
2026-07-14vs Ch.Subasic55MLost 02
L#1 DoublesEvan Fultz / Meghan Kofod vs Mike Cockrill / Mary Cockrill3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Joel Nance vs Julie Sauls / Ken Glanville2-6, 0-6
2026-06-30vs Bi.Green55MWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulian Barnes / Elisebeth Gelardi vs Bill Green / Susan Hackman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEvan Fultz / Meghan Kofod vs Jennifer Hall / Ben Micham2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Reiss / James Vandenbossche vs Barbra Wait / Charles Ashby6-2, 6-4
2026-06-23vs Mi.Strobin55MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Silverberg / Chauncy Nelson vs Sarah Breazeale / Edward Poyo2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Badulis / Evan Fultz vs Helen Strickland / James McCown2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Joel Nance vs Karen Cody / Chris Cody4-6, 0-6
2026-06-16vs Be.Robertson55MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulian Barnes / Meghan Kofod vs Timothy Koves / Kelli Williams0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Craig Leese vs Dara Haney / Ken Haney4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoel Nance / Jennifer Silverberg vs Beth Robertson / Philip Robertson2-6, 2-6
2026-06-09vs Je.Troch55MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulian Barnes / Elisebeth Gelardi vs Jeff Sluder / Carrie Struble3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChauncy Nelson / Meghan Kofod vs Randall Harrill / Michell Wilson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Leese / Laurie Reiss vs William Weis / Pam Weis6-2, 6-3
2026-06-02vs Ca.Conzola55MWon 20
W#1 DoublesEvan Fultz / Meghan Kofod vs Robert Chandler / Laura Munster6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCraig Leese / Laurie Reiss vs Charles Pleasants / Takako Schenberger6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Elisebeth Gelardi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Marina Barthalmus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
3.27
Evan Fultz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Chauncy Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Craig Leese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jocelyn Badulis
published
3.15
Laurie Reiss
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Meghan Kofod
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Silverberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Leo Manning
published
2.85
James Vandenbossche
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Joel Nance
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Julian Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Kofod + Evan Fultz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elisebeth Gelardi
97W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Marina Barthalmus
218W–213L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
16W–16L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Evan Fultz
115W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Chauncy Nelson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Craig Leese
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Jocelyn Badulis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Laurie Reiss
234W–202L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Meghan Kofod
76W–134L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Jennifer Silverberg
37W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Leo Manning
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
James Vandenbossche
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Joel Nance
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Julian Barnes
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.