← Teams

SJRC-Ruhsenberger

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.2 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Michelle Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Miriam Habafy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Pultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Tim Janes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.22
Penny Langhammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
David Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Gus Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Charles Ruhsenberger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Michael Parkhurst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results7 ties
2021-11-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Gus Johnson vs Cyndi Peck / Steven Harrison6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Tim Janes vs Janet Hummel / Stephen Galati6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Paul Kim vs Yayun Tung / Dave Sato6-1, 7-6
2021-10-29Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTim Janes / Michelle Johnson vs Larry Van / THAO VAN7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Michael Parkhurst vs James Takahashi / Catherine Huang6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCharles Ruhsenberger / Miriam Habafy vs Rajesh Vemuri / Jing Feng6-2, 6-2
2021-10-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTim Janes / Michelle Johnson vs Christina Melander / Blake Simonsen6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Gus Johnson vs Audrey Weil / Maarten Schreuder6-1, 6-1
2021-10-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Charles Ruhsenberger vs Kristin Morris / Doug Bruchs6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Michael Parkhurst vs Shari Matyas / Kaushik Shankar6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Stover / David Floyd vs Bill Barnes / Robin Browne6-4, 6-3
2021-10-02Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKatja Daoud / Michael Parkhurst vs Stephanie Harbell / Nathan Gwin6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Tim Janes vs Patricia Kuchar / Alex Harbell6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Gus Johnson vs Anne Johnson / Rich Johnson6-3, 6-1
2021-09-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / David Floyd vs Rob Werlinger / Linnette Donohue6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Charles Ruhsenberger vs Paul OHollaren / Melanie DeSilva6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Michael Parkhurst vs Jake Witty / Amy Nguyen6-2, 6-1
2021-09-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKatja Daoud / Paul Kim vs Brad Harrington / Christin Harrington7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGus Johnson / Jennifer Pultz vs Amos Shepard / Nancy Yen Shipley7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Charles Ruhsenberger vs Greg Meyer / Jessica Meyer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michelle Johnson
82W–103L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Miriam Habafy
105W–82L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Jennifer Pultz
112W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Tim Janes
47W–53L career
0%18%82%
3.23
3.5
Penny Langhammer
61W–36L career
2%97%0%
3.22
3
David Floyd
56W–37L career · type A
0%64%36%
3.06
3
Gus Johnson
37W–29L career
not enough data
—
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71
3
Charles Ruhsenberger
47W–57L career
4%96%0%
2.67
3
Michael Parkhurst
40W–84L career
15%85%0%
2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.