Teams

CDTA S 55&OM9.0 b.Lake Bluff Krizman Mon 7:30 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 55 & Over · CDTA S 55 & over Men 9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMichael Hill / Peter Krizman vs Mark Exner / Brian Dillman6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEliot Schencker / Brad Smith vs Gregory Adams / Manny Velasco7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSteve Paulson / John Pucin vs Andrew Salski / Scott Thornton4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEd Granger / John Pucin vs Zsolt Juhasz / Michael Grantham1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Krizman / Steve Paulson vs George Charuk / John Sherren7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEd Granger / Peter Krizman vs Robert Rao / Douglas Weber3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Pucin / Bruce Harris vs John Sherren / Brad Wilson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEd Granger / Dean Dussias vs Rob Hopkins / George Charuk6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSteve Paulson / Brad Smith vs Michael Grantham / Zsolt Juhasz3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDean Dussias / Ed Granger vs Robert Rao / Andrew Salski6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteve Paulson / Peter Krizman vs Rob Hopkins / Mark Exner6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDean Dussias / Ed Granger vs Rob Hopkins / Douglas Weber5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Hill / John Pucin vs Zsolt Juhasz / Robert Rao6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CDTA S 55 & over Men 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Harris
published 4.5
Dale Hall
published 4.5
Dean Dussias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Ed Granger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Eliot Schencker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
John Pucin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Peter Krizman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Steve Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Paulson + Peter Krizman6454% gamesnot enough data
Dean Dussias + Ed Granger314 matchesnot enough data
John Pucin + Peter Krizman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bruce Harris
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Dale Hall
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Dean Dussias
7W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Ed Granger
7W–12L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Eliot Schencker
3W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
John Pucin
13W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Krizman
55W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Paulson
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.