Teams

Marcotte/FS/CM

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-28vs Tran/FS/CMLost 02
L#1 DoublesNathan Marcotte / Sam Hanna vs Stephen Weeks / Dzung Vu0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Richmond / Mitchell Spradlin vs Don Praphan / Arpan Pallar0-6, 0-6
2025-05-18vs Tran/FS/CMLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrandon Richmond / Nathan Marcotte vs Diem Tran / Britt Mounce7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSam Hanna / Mark Hoskyn vs Jackson Cervantes / Patrick Meador3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJoshua Kilgore vs Don Praphan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-15vs Parks/Huckelbury/FS/CMWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrandon Richmond / Bernie Manard vs Jacob Frueh / Riley Palmer2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNathan Marcotte vs Chad Parks6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRandy Magness / Christopher Hooks vs Dalesandro Flores / Thai Tran5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-01vs Parks/Huckelbury/FS/CMLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Willis / Larry Isch vs Jacob Frueh / Jonathan Gray7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoshua Kilgore vs Riley Palmer1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNathan Marcotte / Martyn Parker vs Dalesandro Flores / Thai Tran1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Moore/FS/BGWon 32
L#1 DoublesRandy Magness / James Willis vs Charles Warren / Larry Schwartz6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJoshua Kilgore vs Curtis Abbott7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Marcotte / Brandon Richmond vs Mark Hoskyn / Steve Drake4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSam Hanna vs Alan Carlisle6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKane Whitt / Martyn Parker vs Gary Smith / Roberto Tarin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Tran/FS/CMLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoshua Kilgore / Nathan Marcotte vs Dzung Vu / Hung Nguyen3-6, 2-6
2025-04-10vs Parks/Huckelbury/FS/CMLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Hooks / Shane Irgens vs Ian Caldarera / Stephen Schaefer0-1
L#1 SinglesNathan Marcotte vs Jonathan Gray4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRandy Magness / James Willis vs Chad Parks / Dalesandro Flores6-1, 6-3
2025-04-06vs Tran/FS/CMLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Humphrey / Joshua Kilgore vs Arpan Pallar / Patrick Meador1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNathan Marcotte vs Ryder MacK6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrandon Richmond / Mark Hoskyn vs Hung Nguyen / Dzung Vu3-6, 2-6
2025-04-01vs Moore/FS/BGSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJoshua Kilgore / Nathan Marcotte vs David Humphrey / David Moore6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Hooks vs Curtis Abbott3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBernie Manard / Brandon Richmond vs Steve Drake / Charles Warren6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartyn Parker / Kane Whitt vs Clayton McGill / Varun Gampa3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-25vs Moore/FS/BGWon 32
L#1 DoublesBrandon Richmond / Sam Hanna vs David Moore / David Humphrey4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRandy Magness vs Alan Carlisle6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBernie Manard / Nathan Marcotte vs Steve Drake / Larry Schwartz6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesShane Irgens vs Roberto Tarin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLarry Isch / James Willis vs Varun Gampa / Gary Smith6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
James Willis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Larry Isch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Brandon Richmond
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Nathan Marcotte
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
Bernie Manard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Christopher Hooks
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Shane Irgens
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Martyn Parker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joshua Kilgore
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kane Whitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Magness
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Sam Hanna
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Isch + James Willis314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James Willis
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Larry Isch
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Brandon Richmond
5W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Nathan Marcotte
8W–10L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bernie Manard
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Hooks
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shane Irgens
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Martyn Parker
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Joshua Kilgore
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kane Whitt
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Magness
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Hanna
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.