Teams

WestLake WARRIORS

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-20vs Ojai OrangesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Laura Mealer vs Tahnie Toland / Heidi Bensinger2-6, 3-6
2025-12-07vs Sunset All DayLost 01
L#1 DoublesLAUREN WILKINS / Hannah Buehring vs Julie Clark / SANDI WISE3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-11-22vs V- LLW Slice Girls- HibnerLost 02
L#2 DoublesLaura Mealer / Leslie Silverman vs Kate Torrence / Marilyn Germann3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLindsay Cowen / LaDawn Rice vs Laura Kiker / Sandhya Patel3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-09vs Moorpark Acing GracefullySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarian Roberts / Beth Bearer vs Kasia Domenech / Alana Martinez1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Laura Mealer vs Lisa Trombley / Lynne F Krueger7-5, 6-3
2025-11-02vs Royal AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaDawn Rice / LAUREN WILKINS vs Deborah Kerr-Orlik / Michelle Parent7-6, 6-3
2025-10-26vs Las Posas MimosasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Mealer / Maryrose Bleier vs Diana Clark / Krista Howard6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Bearer / Beth Esters vs Juliet Tamayo / Catalina Wise6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-17vs WAC Ninjas Fall 2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Silverman / Laura Mealer vs Susie Castle / Susan Cass6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLaDawn Rice / Ann Francisco vs Tracy Collins / Laura Reiland6-2, 6-0
2025-10-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaDawn Rice / LAUREN WILKINS vs Kim Johnson / Sharon McBee6-2, 6-2
2025-09-21vs NR FIREBALLS FALL 25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Warren / Kimberly Bickmore-Hutt vs Kimberley Bennett / Kristin Snowden0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Beth Bearer vs Wendy Dormer / Shari Schiff6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-13vs Valley Lindo Tough LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesHannah Buehring / Michelle Ha vs Patricia Ameca / Barbara Nelles7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnn Francisco / Beth Bearer vs Roberta Reis / Monica Hiranandani2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Hannah Buehring
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Lindsay Cowen
published
3.40
Mary Kaiser-Cole
published
3.37
Laura Mealer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Kimberly Bickmore-Hutt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
LAUREN WILKINS
published
3.22
Lisa Marnell
published
3.19
Na Shen
published
3.16
Siena Heintz
published
3.15
Mary Scotti
published
3.13
Ann Francisco
published 3.5
3.13
Maryrose Bleier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Lisa Bedigian
published
3.11
Leslie Silverman
published
3.10
Beth Bearer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Georgann Lott
published 3.5
3.04
LaDawn Rice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Darian Roberts
published 3
2.81
Melissa Warren
published
2.63
Beth Esters
published 3
Judy Caparon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Kaiser-Cole + Hannah Buehring6069% games+13.4% vs expected
Mary Kaiser-Cole + Lindsay Cowen5556% games+7.6% vs expected
LAUREN WILKINS + LaDawn Rice3646% games+1.9% vs expected
Laura Mealer + Maryrose Bleier171449% gamesnot enough data
Laura Mealer + Beth Bearer5455% gamesnot enough data
Beth Bearer + Mary Scotti224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Cowen + LAUREN WILKINS134 matchesnot enough data
LAUREN WILKINS + Na Shen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Buehring
81W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Lindsay Cowen
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Mary Kaiser-Cole
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Laura Mealer
88W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Kimberly Bickmore-Hutt
58W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
LAUREN WILKINS
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lisa Marnell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Na Shen
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Siena Heintz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Mary Scotti
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Ann Francisco
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Maryrose Bleier
72W–92L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Lisa Bedigian
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Leslie Silverman
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Beth Bearer
87W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Georgann Lott
63W–95L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
LaDawn Rice
35W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Darian Roberts
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Melissa Warren
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Beth Esters
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Judy Caparon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.