Teams

LBurks-Adams (Life Time)

2022 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-29vs JButkovich (Life Time)Split 11
L#2 SinglesAmy Rottman vs Jessica Gentile1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKimi Parker vs Deborah Smith-Shaw6-2, 7-5
2022-07-22vs CDewaele (Springfield)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Rottman vs Volree Wade1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKimi Parker vs Amie Caudle6-7, 4-6
2022-07-15vs BLindley (Firethorne)Won 10
W#3 SinglesAmy Rottman vs Patty Swan6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-08vs JButkovich (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 SinglesAmy Rottman vs Deborah Smith-Shaw6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-01vs CDewaele (Springfield)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLinda Burks-Adams vs CHRISTI DEWAELE2-1
L#2 SinglesKelli Arenson vs Volree Wade1-6, 1-4
2022-06-24vs BLindley (Firethorne)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesLinda Burks-Adams vs Shalini Patel0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKelli Arenson vs Danielle Shealy2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKimi Parker vs Sheri Newman6-4, 6-3
2022-06-17vs JButkovich (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 SinglesAmy Rottman vs Kristin Colson7-5, 7-6
2022-06-03vs BLindley (Firethorne)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKelli Arenson vs Jennifer McCoy0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLinda Burks-Adams vs TARA RAND1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Raquel Correa
published
2.98
Kimi Parker
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.91
Melissa Pflum
published
2.71
Amy Rottman
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.52
Linda Burks-Adams
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.45
Kelli Arenson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.17
Ursula Bonar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimi Parker + Kelli Arenson7454% games+2.9% vs expected
Ursula Bonar + Kelli Arenson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raquel Correa
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Kimi Parker
69W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.98
Melissa Pflum
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Amy Rottman
30W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Linda Burks-Adams
41W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Kelli Arenson
35W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%65%35%
2.45
Ursula Bonar
11W–30L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.