Teams

UPTA50S/Gallagher/Brookstone

2025 UPTA Singles 50 & Over - SC · 50+ Singles Men - 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-25vs UPTA50S/Edwards/CardinalWon 21
W#1 SinglesRichard Penland vs Brian Speight4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDavid Keen vs Cary Null6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHenry Strzelecki vs Dave Federspiel2-6, 3-6
2025-10-18vs UPTA50S/Greenstreet/Neely FarmLost 12
L#1 SinglesRichard Penland vs David Allen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRandel Cooper vs Jeff Greenstreet6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesColin Gallagher vs Brian Thomas6-4, 6-4
2025-09-27vs UPTA50S/Greenstreet/Neely FarmWon 30
W#1 SinglesRichard Penland vs David Allen6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDavid Keen vs Russell Shelley6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHenry Strzelecki vs Brian Thomas7-5, 6-4
2025-09-23vs UPTA50S/Edwards/CardinalWon 30
W#1 SinglesDavid Keen vs Brian Speight3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRichard Penland vs Cary Null6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRandel Cooper vs Clarke McIntosh6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 50+ Singles Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
David Keen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Randel Cooper
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Henry Strzelecki
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Colin Gallagher
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
David Dutterer
published 3.5
Richard Penland
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Penland + Colin Gallagher2443% games+0.2% vs expected
Colin Gallagher + David Keen3240% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Keen
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Randel Cooper
38W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Henry Strzelecki
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Colin Gallagher
23W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
David Dutterer
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Richard Penland
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.