Teams

SB LLW-Ponies-Emily Gardner

Tri-Level 18 & Over · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-26vs Elings-Tri ChicksWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnie Dzierski / Susanna McMahon vs Lisa Daley / Nina Gustason3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-08-19vs KTC-High TriWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnie Dzierski / Susanna McMahon vs Marian Smith-McBroom / Rachael Stein6-3, 6-3
2023-08-05vs Elings-Tri ChicksWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnie Dzierski / Susanna McMahon vs Lisa Daley / Monica Wilson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-15vs Elings-Tri ChicksLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnnie Dzierski / Laura Bridley vs Lisa Daley / Monica Wilson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Victoria Colf
published
4.33
Emily Gardner
published 4.5
Chloe Hunter
published 4.5
3.80
Nancy Garrison
published
3.62
Caron Berryhill
published 4
3.58
Susanna McMahon
published
3.13
Annie Dzierski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Kathleen Kleine
published
Jolie Seemayer
published
Robin Nielsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Kleine + Susanna McMahon2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Colf
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
4.49
4.5
Emily Gardner
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.33
4.5
Chloe Hunter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Garrison
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Caron Berryhill
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Susanna McMahon
40W–45L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Annie Dzierski
124W–118L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Kathleen Kleine
12W–25L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
Jolie Seemayer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Nielsen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.