Teams

TYCC - M. Garcia

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-08vs FH Sweetspots - C. DemingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Rockwood / Carrie Ferderigos vs Carrie Deming / Jesse Glassford6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Courtney Steiner vs Susan MOSHER / Carrie Pigott2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLindsay Davitt vs Lourdes Bacardi0-6, 3-6
2021-10-29vs VDF - P. MooreLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmanda Rockwood vs Angie Focke4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLauren Green / Lindsay Davitt vs Bobbi Royak / Sharmila Seth5-7, 4-6
2021-10-11vs Cheval Smashionistas - J. UrbanWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Green / Lindsay Davitt vs Robin Perrone / Cheryl Bell6-3, 6-2
2021-09-27vs FH Matchmakers - D. LinthicumSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAmanda Rockwood vs Meredith Vasey7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Lauren Green vs Merbaliz Ferris / Carlee Revoy1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Amanda Rockwood
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Tracy MacKechnie
published
3.33
Carrie Ferderigos
published 3.5
3.28
Jennifer Harrell
published
3.16
Erica Brandon
published 3.5
3.16
Courtney Steiner
published 3.5
3.08
Jessica Eggleston
published
2.96
Lauren Green
published
2.95
Amy Hale
published 3
2.95
Lindsay Davitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.95
Tate Casper
published
2.57
Sarah Weaver
published
Joelle Bertozzi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Green + Lindsay Davitt314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Harrell + Erica Brandon123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Green + Amy Hale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Rockwood
103W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
Tracy MacKechnie
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Carrie Ferderigos
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Jennifer Harrell
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Erica Brandon
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Courtney Steiner
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jessica Eggleston
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Lauren Green
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Amy Hale
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Lindsay Davitt
87W–66L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Tate Casper
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Sarah Weaver
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Joelle Bertozzi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.