Teams

A.Willard 55+

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs S.RoseLost 02
L#2 DoublesSharon Cole / Maureen Nixon vs Susan Rose / Stacey Jacobs6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Salstrand / Sharon Fred vs Millie Rushton / Wanda Wilson5-7, 3-6
2023-04-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Shuey / Pamela Pitre vs Karen Murphy / Michele Walker5-7, 5-7
2023-04-17vs C.PanzlWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Mccartney / Maureen Nixon vs Sherry Goodson / Dorothy Nance6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Pitre / Jade Paunovich vs Pam Weis / Joy Cooper6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs L.NogaLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnn Willard / Maureen Nixon vs Brenda Li / Pamela Alder7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Mccartney / Sharon Fred vs Amy Barclay / Dale Martin0-6, 2-6
2023-04-03vs E.OsbourneLost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Fred / Sarah Glover vs Dawn Johnstone / Jocelyn Badulis5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-20vs C.Conzola 55+ 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesMaureen Nixon / Barbara Mccartney vs Evelyn Andino / Wendy Christensen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Cole / Jade Paunovich vs Minh NguyenLe / Frauke Mirenda2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-13vs C.WerderWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Shuey / Pamela Pitre vs Sonya Rhiver / Lisa DeMarco7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Glover / Jill Salstrand vs Cathy Werder / Jane Stutzman7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Barbara Mccartney
published 3.5
3.20
Ann Willard
published 3.5
3.10
Sharon Cole
published
3.02
Maureen Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Sharon Fred
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Jill Salstrand
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.87
Julie Shuey
published
2.71
Jade Paunovich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Pamela Pitre
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Shuey + Jade Paunovich1740% games−3.6% vs expected
Barbara Mccartney + Maureen Nixon2352% games−3.8% vs expected
Pamela Pitre + Jade Paunovich3444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Mccartney
5W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Ann Willard
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Sharon Cole
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Maureen Nixon
77W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Sharon Fred
151W–155L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Jill Salstrand
71W–77L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
Julie Shuey
11W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Jade Paunovich
85W–180L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Pamela Pitre
47W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.