Teams

HILLS/Adult65&Over6.0W/ M. Huntington

2026 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-13vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Huntington / Debra Lowe vs Leisa Jordan / Kandy Wood6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Woodruff / Karen Johnson vs Karen Bateman / Julianna Holbrook6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSharon Lucas / Christine Nethers vs Dorothy Flair / Susan Rind6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKathleen Norton / Kelsey B Nix vs Mary Raymond / Cissy Barr6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret McGillivray / Kathleen Gafarian vs Ginger Marchiniak / Donna Whiting7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynn Malarz / Nancy Matuszak vs Amalia Alaniz / Jane Feeney6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-27vs Hunters Green - E. VickersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Kathleen Norton vs Theresa Mays / Peggy Pusateri0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Lucas / Karen Johnson vs Ellen Ghelardi / Amy Rairigh3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret McGillivray / Kathleen Gafarian vs Karen Cleland / Cindy Arment6-2, 7-5
2026-02-20vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesSharon Woodruff / Christine Nethers vs Catherine Mueller / Kandy Wood5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Debra Lowe vs Karen Bateman / Leisa Jordan6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRenee Hovden / Kelsey B Nix vs Margaret Huggins / Sheila Brown6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Margaret McGillivray vs Donna Whiting / Amalia Alaniz7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Lowe / Kathleen Norton vs Cissy Barr / Ginger Marchiniak7-5, 6-1
2026-02-06vs Hunters Green - E. VickersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Kathleen Norton vs Carmen Heggen / Karen Cachion6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMargaret McGillivray / Kathleen Gafarian vs Karen Cleland / Amy Rairigh6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Johnson / Christine Nethers vs Pat Morris / Ellen Ghelardi4-6, 4-6
2026-01-30vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Kathleen Norton vs Catherine Mueller / Karen Bateman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret McGillivray / Renee Hovden vs Patricia Smith / Kandy Wood2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Matuszak / Lynn Malarz vs Susan Sommerfield / Susan Rind6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Margaret McGillivray vs Barbara Dolan / Ginger Marchiniak6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Norton / Renee Hovden vs Mary Raymond / Karen Montembeault7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Lucas / Karen Johnson vs Donna Whiting / Amalia Alaniz6-3, 7-5
2026-01-16vs Hunters Green - E. VickersLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Margaret McGillivray vs Peggy Pusateri / Karen Cachion4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Norton / Kelsey B Nix vs Karen Cleland / Theresa Mays6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Woodruff / Nancy Matuszak vs Carmen Heggen / Amy Rairigh7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Debra Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Kathleen Gafarian
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.58
Christine Nethers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kathleen Norton
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Kelsey B Nix
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lynn Malarz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret McGillivray
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Mary Huntington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Matuszak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Hovden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Lucas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Woodruff
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret McGillivray + Kathleen Gafarian6063% gamesnot enough data
Debra Lowe + Kathleen Norton404 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Matuszak + Lynn Malarz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Lowe
57W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kathleen Gafarian
12W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Christine Nethers
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Kathleen Norton
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelsey B Nix
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Malarz
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret McGillivray
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Huntington
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Matuszak
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Hovden
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Lucas
39W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Woodruff
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.