Teams

KY/LEX/CHARLES/SENTERS

2022 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over SOUTHERN COMBO DOUBLES LEXINGTON · 6.5 ADULT WOMEN

20 players · average NTRP 3.56 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jennifer Gieselman
published
3.68
Erin Azbell
published 4
3.55
Julie Carlisle
published
3.48
KASSIE KESSINGER
published
3.39
Kristen Tewell
published
3.39
Kirsten van Haaren
published
3.34
Jordan Reeves
published
Alice Dearborn
published 3.5
Christy Charles
published 3.5
Darya Droz
published 3.5
3.21
Doris Senters
published 3.5
3.18
Robbie Doctrow
published
3.17
Carlyn Moore
published 3.5
3.12
Cathy Corales
published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Kubajak
published
3.09
Catherine Leslie
published 3.5
3.03
Lauren Saini
published
2.97
Marvetta Overstreet
published
2.83
Natalie Carlisle
published
Rena Baer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Azbell + Jordan Reeves25463% games+9.3% vs expected
Doris Senters + Kirsten van Haaren12456% games+3.3% vs expected
Kristen Tewell + Doris Senters7648% games+0.8% vs expected
Julie Carlisle + Kirsten van Haaren213 matchesnot enough data
Carlyn Moore + Darya Droz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gieselman
36W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erin Azbell
39W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Julie Carlisle
17W–26L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
KASSIE KESSINGER
28W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Kristen Tewell
32W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kirsten van Haaren
52W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jordan Reeves
31W–9L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Alice Dearborn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christy Charles
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Darya Droz
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Doris Senters
85W–66L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Robbie Doctrow
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carlyn Moore
28W–58L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Cathy Corales
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Kelly Kubajak
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Catherine Leslie
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
Lauren Saini
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Marvetta Overstreet
14W–60L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
Natalie Carlisle
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Rena Baer
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.