Teams

Pershing-Unstrung

Adult 18 & Over - SB · SB - Women - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.91 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-28vs SB LLW-I'd Hit That-Millie TadewaldtSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBeth Ford / Catherine Gill vs Millie Tadewaldt / BROOKE COSTELLO5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesYang Ja Ballard vs Andreana Jones6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeverly Aronson / Nancy Garrison vs Cassie Brungarth / Sheri Copus5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAndrea Borgatello Forry / Christina Stoney vs Kristen Battles / Christine Hale3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-25vs Alisal-Rancheros, FilliesWon 40
W#1 DoublesBeth Ford / Yang Ja Ballard vs Jen Haskell / Sara Oshaughnessy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCatherine Gill vs Cassie Campbell0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Borgatello Forry / Nancy Garrison vs Gail Edry / Corrie Meals6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeverly Aronson / Carrie Randolph vs Walden Bohnet / Rosemary Talmadge6-0, 6-1
2026-06-14vs Elings-English MuffinsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBeverly Aronson / Sarah Coffman vs Kimberly Eubank / Deborah Babineau2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmma Mollenhauer vs Stacey Gannon1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Garrison / Daisy Carlson vs Heather Reed / Patricia English6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarrie Randolph / Andrea Borgatello Forry vs Jaclyn Park / Tina Panos7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-07vs SBTC-Pickle Paloma'sWon 31
W#1 DoublesSarah Coffman / Daisy Carlson vs Cecilia Borchardt / Jill Crang5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCatherine Gill vs Jennifer Wolt6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBeth Ford / Carrie Randolph vs Stephanie Robles / Debbie Rhodes6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSavannah Bosley / Emma Mollenhauer vs Galen Wilson / Jill Sagner2-6, 2-6
2026-05-24vs COAC-Smash SistersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBeth Ford / Beverly Aronson vs Bethany Anderson / Jenny Kearns6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Coffman vs Justine Casady6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Borgatello Forry / Carrie Randolph vs Susanna McMahon / Katherine Keller7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIris Campbell / Savannah Bosley vs Gabriela Holland / Holly Casady6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-10vs SB LLW-I'd Hit That-Millie TadewaldtSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Coffman / Daisy Carlson vs Sheri Copus / Bess Scribner6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesCatherine Gill vs Cassie Brungarth6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBeth Ford / Yang Ja Ballard vs Millie Tadewaldt / BROOKE COSTELLO5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJacqui Burge / Beverly Aronson vs Cynthia Frohling / Julia Frohling6-3, 7-5
2026-05-03vs Alisal-Rancheros, FilliesWon 31
W#1 DoublesBeth Ford / Jacqui Burge vs Rosemary Talmadge / Samantha Ireland6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesYang Ja Ballard vs Michelle-marie Burmester6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIris Campbell / Emma Mollenhauer vs Gigi Hollister / Sara Oshaughnessy2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarrie Randolph / Catherine Gill vs Lisa Daley / Patty Lopez6-4, 6-4
2026-04-26vs Elings-English MuffinsWon 31
W#1 DoublesJacqui Burge / Yang Ja Ballard vs Bina Ahmed / Heather Reed7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCatherine Gill vs Sumiko Trenholme6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIris Campbell / Beverly Aronson vs Kristen Kovacs / Deborah Babineau6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Coffman / Andrea Borgatello Forry vs KC Collins / Kimberly Eubank6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-19vs SBTC-Pickle Paloma'sSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBeth Ford / Catherine Gill vs Shauna Quill / Tara Frimat6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesYang Ja Ballard vs Alexandra Phillips6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Stoney / Beverly Aronson vs Jill Crang / Alicia Linquiti4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIris Campbell / Savannah Bosley vs Debbie Rhodes / Emma Bridges4-6, 3-6
2026-04-12vs COAC-Smash SistersWon 31
L#1 DoublesBeth Ford / Jacqui Burge vs Julia Cushing / Katherine Keller6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesIris Campbell vs Gabriela Holland6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaisy Carlson / Yang Ja Ballard vs Ariel Long / Lori Travis7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndrea Borgatello Forry / Nancy Garrison vs Katie Zimmerman / MARGARET LEARMONTH6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Beth Ford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.91
Yang Ja Ballard
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.87
Iris Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Jacqui Burge
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Daisy Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Sarah Coffman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.80
Nancy Garrison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Beverly Aronson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.63
Christina Stoney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Carrie Randolph
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Catherine Gill
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.34
Emma Mollenhauer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.29
Andrea Borgatello Forry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Savannah Bosley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Gill + Beth Ford5166% games+15.3% vs expected
Carrie Randolph + Christina Stoney7358% games+5.6% vs expected
Beth Ford + Yang Ja Ballard16364% games+4.2% vs expected
Beverly Aronson + Sarah Coffman4258% games+1.6% vs expected
Nancy Garrison + Beverly Aronson6160% games−2.1% vs expected
Carrie Randolph + Andrea Borgatello Forry2350% games−2.7% vs expected
Beverly Aronson + Yang Ja Ballard5254% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Garrison + Daisy Carlson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Ford
89W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Yang Ja Ballard
137W–73L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Iris Campbell
28W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Jacqui Burge
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Daisy Carlson
186W–93L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
Sarah Coffman
19W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
Nancy Garrison
31W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Beverly Aronson
111W–106L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Christina Stoney
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Randolph
22W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Catherine Gill
29W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Emma Mollenhauer
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Andrea Borgatello Forry
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Savannah Bosley
12W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.