Teams

Chata/Laura Willimon

2026 CHATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-01vs Chata/Julia BlantonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Holmes / Hyunsuk Lee vs Laura Daniel / Liz Kang6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Willimon / MacKenzie Rogers vs Mamie Crawford / Christina Jackson1-6, 5-7
2026-02-28vs Chata/Julia BlantonWon 20
W#1 DoublesHyunsuk Lee / Ana Niknejad vs Mamie Crawford / Jeanine Allen7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Davison / Lizzie Simpson vs Connie Hensler / Mary Lynn Childress6-3, 6-4
2026-02-22vs Chata/Julia BlantonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Willimon / MacKenzie Rogers vs Mamie Crawford / Christina Jackson6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHyunsuk Lee / Ana Niknejad vs Julia Blanton / Jackie Teall6-3, 6-4
2026-02-17vs Chata/Julia BlantonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Holmes / Lizzie Simpson vs Connie Hensler / Laura Daniel6-0, 6-4
2026-02-08vs Chata/Julia BlantonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Davison / Ana Niknejad vs Julia Blanton / Jeanine Allen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHyunsuk Lee / MacKenzie Rogers vs Mamie Crawford / Jackie Teall6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-03vs Chata/Julia BlantonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSonya Brown / Kimberly Davison vs Julia Blanton / Christina Jackson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMacKenzie Rogers / Hyunsuk Lee vs Mamie Crawford / Mary Lynn Childress1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chata/Laura Willimon41731084
2Chata/Julia Blanton143716103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Laura Willimon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.35
Hyunsuk Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.35
Kimberly Davison
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.31
Ana Niknejad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Catherine Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.87
MacKenzie Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lizzie Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Davison + Catherine Holmes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Willimon
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Hyunsuk Lee
18W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Kimberly Davison
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Ana Niknejad
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Catherine Holmes
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
MacKenzie Rogers
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Lizzie Simpson
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.