Teams

Ragsdale

2022 Leon Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-08vs Leon/Khairallah/7.5/WomenLost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Lori Elliott vs Xiaobing Zhang / Nancy Donahue2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMariela Bartens / Susan Ragsdale vs Pia Lehtonen / Irene Ellis2-6, 3-6
2022-11-17vs HerringLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariela Bartens / Susan Ragsdale vs Kathy Beggs / Elaine Rudd2-6, 2-6
2022-10-27vs HerringLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Nichols / Stacy Chick vs Sherry Cady / Karen de Cardenas6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Farida Akhavan vs Elaine Rudd / Kathy Beggs3-6, 2-6
2022-10-20vs Leon/Khairallah/7.5/WomenLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Kelly Tucker vs Lisa Franson / Elizabeth Murray3-6, 3-6
2022-10-06vs HerringLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Elizabeth Hawkins vs Tracy Propp / Susan Goodwin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Ragsdale / Farida Akhavan vs Rhonda Tullos / Elaine Rudd6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-29vs Leon/Khairallah/7.5/WomenLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Chick / Kim Nichols vs Lisa Franson / Nancy Donahue4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLori Elliott / Susan Emmanuel vs Xiaobing Zhang / Kathy Maus4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-09-15vs HerringLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Chick / Sharon Dailey vs Kathy Beggs / Jennifer Larson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMariela Bartens / Susan Ragsdale vs Rhonda Tullos / Brenda Jahn1-6, 4-6
2022-09-08vs Leon/Khairallah/7.5/WomenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKim Nichols / Stacy Chick vs Marie Go / Nancy Donahue6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Ragsdale / Mariela Bartens vs Elizabeth Murray / Fang Liang1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Stacy Chick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Sharon Dailey
published 3.5
3.33
Mariela Bartens
published 3.5
3.18
Lori Elliott
published
3.09
Susan Emmanuel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Susan Ragsdale
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Kim Nichols
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Emmanuel + Susan Ragsdale141552% games+1.1% vs expected
Stacy Chick + Susan Emmanuel123 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Chick + Susan Ragsdale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stacy Chick
59W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Sharon Dailey
60W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Mariela Bartens
67W–47L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Lori Elliott
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.18
3.5
Susan Emmanuel
73W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Susan Ragsdale
59W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Kim Nichols
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.