Teams

Granath

Adult 18 & Over League · Adult 18 & Over 3.0W

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-14vs BrileyLost 12
W#1 DoublesMonaLisa Fischer / Ginger Granath vs Ashley Snook / Amelia Soto7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPatricia Larson vs Sylvia Guadarrama3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGinger Wisniewski / Mackenzie Davis vs Troi Middleton / Michelle Chapa1-6, 0-6
2026-04-30vs AllisonWon 40
W#1 DoublesKirby Felts / CoCo Simpson vs Monse Garcia / Lacy Allison6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Larson / Kasie Thompson vs Racheal Jacoby / Kristi McCarter6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCatherine Cuenca-Torres vs Kyann Slaughter7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGinger Wisniewski / Mackenzie Davis vs Carolina Raymond / Deanna Vaughan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-09vs AllisonWon 31
W#1 DoublesGinger Granath / MonaLisa Fischer vs Carolina Raymond / Kyann Slaughter6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesPatricia Larson vs Luli Martinez7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Cuenca-Torres / Bridget Barbee vs Lacy Allison / Kristi McCarter6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesGinger Wisniewski vs Monse Garcia2-6, 3-6
2026-03-26vs BrileySplit 22
L#1 DoublesKasie Thompson / MonaLisa Fischer vs Kelcey Wells / Troi Middleton0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBridget Barbee / Catherine Cuenca-Torres vs Ashley Snook / Lisa Alexander7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPatricia Larson vs Rikki Sarabia Bosmans6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGinger Wisniewski / Mackenzie Davis vs Staci Wetz / Theresa Welch1-6, 0-6
2025-03-13vs BrileyLost 01
L#1 DoublesGinger Granath / MonaLisa Fischer vs Michelle Chapa / Annette Schwartz3-6, 5-7
2025-03-10vs BrileyLost 01
L#1 DoublesGinger Granath / Catherine Cuenca-Torres vs Mary Vega / Theresa Welch4-6, 2-6
2025-03-06vs BrileyWon 20
W#1 DoublesCoCo Simpson / Bridget Barbee vs Troi Middleton / Michelle Chapa3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGloria Lowman / Catherine Cuenca-Torres vs Melia Pullig / Cindy Hensley6-4, 6-4
2025-02-25vs CollinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBridget Barbee / CoCo Simpson vs Troi Middleton / Lela Batten6-4, 7-6
2025-02-22vs BrileyLost 02
L#1 SinglesCoCo Simpson vs Kristi Briley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cuenca-Torres / Tiffany Halsell vs Amelia Soto / Sylvia Guadarrama4-6, 4-6
2025-02-06vs BrileyLost 03
L#1 DoublesBridget Barbee / CoCo Simpson vs Kristi Briley / Lela Batten7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cuenca-Torres / Gloria Lowman vs Mary Vega / Lisa Alexander4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMonaLisa Fischer / Jody Jones vs Melia Pullig / Annette Schwartz0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult 18 & Over 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Briley40164985
2Granath2213717154
3Allison0411938232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Bridget Barbee
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.86
Patricia Larson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
CoCo Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.82
Catherine Cuenca-Torres
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.77
MonaLisa Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Kirby Felts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.75
Meaghan Davis
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.71
Ginger Granath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Ginger Wisniewski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.41
Mackenzie Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kasie Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MonaLisa Fischer + CoCo Simpson2348% games+7.1% vs expected
CoCo Simpson + Bridget Barbee3350% games+5.5% vs expected
MonaLisa Fischer + Ginger Granath3646% games+4.4% vs expected
Catherine Cuenca-Torres + Ginger Granath2538% gamesnot enough data
MonaLisa Fischer + Catherine Cuenca-Torres2452% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Cuenca-Torres + Bridget Barbee3262% gamesnot enough data
MonaLisa Fischer + Bridget Barbee123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Cuenca-Torres + CoCo Simpson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bridget Barbee
19W–35L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Patricia Larson
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
CoCo Simpson
23W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Catherine Cuenca-Torres
25W–52L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
MonaLisa Fischer
14W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Kirby Felts
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Meaghan Davis
9W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Ginger Granath
17W–53L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Ginger Wisniewski
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Mackenzie Davis
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Kasie Thompson
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.