Teams

Mulkey/40/6.5/CM/CCLA

2026 BR Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 6.5 BR (40&O) Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
Sep 15 6:30 PM
The Country Club of Louisiana
Sep 22 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Madison Mulkey
Sep 29 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Oct 6 6:30 PM
The Country Club of Louisiana
2026-08-25vs Mannino/40/6.5/CM/UCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBlake Whittle / Kevin Dibenedetto vs Justin Miller / Michael Dupont0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Smith / James Peltier vs Ryan Kinsley / William Adams4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Mulkey / Alan Schroeder vs Justin Day / Kory Byers1-6, 4-6
2026-08-18vs Ligh/40/6.5/CM/BRECWon 21
L#1 DoublesVal Generes / Rob Dille vs Thomas Wafer / Charles Bernhard3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRusty Jenkins / Blake Whittle vs Andrew Muhl / Chandra Kandula6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMadison Mulkey / Jonathan Travis vs Jody Capello / J C Richardson6-3, 6-3
2026-08-04vs Braud/40/6.5/CM/SOACWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Leonard / Alan Schroeder vs Andrew Beadle / Tyson Duplantis6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Dibenedetto / Hank Chiles vs Jerome Skrandel / Michael Vincent3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMax Huff / Blake Whittle vs Michael Engle / Gary Etheridge6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Magnon/40/6.5/CM/SOACSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRobert Hebert / Jeremy Martin vs Joey Crifasi / Richard Howell4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJames Peltier / Kip Smith vs Stephen Magnon / Erik Burns6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 BR (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ligh/40/6.5/CM/BREC3072773
2Mulkey/40/6.5/CM/CCLA2042648
3Mannino/40/6.5/CM/UC2163675
4Braud/40/6.5/CM/SOAC03361394
5Magnon/40/6.5/CM/SOAC031817109

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Rusty Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
James Peltier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Kevin Dibenedetto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Val Generes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Robert Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Keith Favaro
published
3.21
Madison Mulkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Kip Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
David Mathies
published 3.5
3.08
Rob Dille
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Max Huff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Jonathan Travis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Blake Whittle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Scott Ginn
published
2.80
Jeremy Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Hank Chiles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Alan Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Schroeder + Kip Smith6260% games+18.7% vs expected
Max Huff + Kip Smith3259% games+10.6% vs expected
Jeremy Martin + Jonathan Travis5164% games+7.3% vs expected
David Mathies + Rusty Jenkins2443% games+3.9% vs expected
Max Huff + Alan Schroeder5257% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Dibenedetto + Keith Favaro0527% gamesnot enough data
Madison Mulkey + Val Generes314 matchesnot enough data
Max Huff + Blake Whittle404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rusty Jenkins
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
James Peltier
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Kevin Dibenedetto
19W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Val Generes
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Robert Hebert
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Keith Favaro
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.25
Madison Mulkey
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kip Smith
36W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
David Mathies
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Rob Dille
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Max Huff
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jonathan Travis
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Blake Whittle
22W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Scott Ginn
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Jeremy Martin
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Hank Chiles
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Alan Schroeder
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.