Teams

Hee Sun Kim

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over Winter Leagues · 4.0 Winter Adult Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-05vs Christina BrittLost 12
L#1 DoublesMona Palmer / Tami Murphy vs Allison Anbari / Christina Britt4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPatricia Musick vs Carolee Jones6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristina Waugh / Carolyn Hanger vs Kelly Hayes / Kortney Wassam3-6, 1-6
2025-02-27vs Christina BrittLost 03
L#1 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Cheryl Ballou vs Christina Britt / Kortney Wassam6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Hanger vs Carolee Jones2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMona Palmer / Christina Waugh vs Kelly Hayes / Leslie Echols6-7, 4-6
2025-02-19vs Christina BrittWon 30
W#1 DoublesMona Palmer / Tami Murphy vs Stephanie Wachob / Kelly Hayes0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPatricia Musick vs Leslie Echols6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesHee-Sun Kim vs Allison Anbari6-1, 6-0
2025-02-12vs Christina BrittLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Ballou / Tami Murphy vs Kelly Hayes / Leslie Echols3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHee-Sun Kim vs Carolee Jones4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Waugh / Carolyn Hanger vs Allison Anbari / Stephanie Wachob4-6, 2-6
2025-02-05vs Christina BrittLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Crouthers / Patricia Musick vs Allison Anbari / Stephanie Wachob6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHee-Sun Kim vs Carolee Jones4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMona Palmer / Cheryl Ballou vs Christina Britt / Kortney Wassam3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Winter Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Waugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Hee-Sun Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Kathy Crouthers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Cheryl Ballou
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Tami Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Carolyn Hanger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Mona Palmer
published
Patricia Musick
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Musick + Kathy Crouthers4164% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Musick + Cheryl Ballou213 matchesnot enough data
Tami Murphy + Carolyn Hanger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Waugh
0W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Hee-Sun Kim
85W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Kathy Crouthers
32W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Cheryl Ballou
52W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Tami Murphy
79W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Carolyn Hanger
20W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mona Palmer
34W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Musick
67W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.