Teams

CCV Avery

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-10vs MRTC - Finn Battery ParkLost 23
L#1 DoublesMason Antrim / Danny MacNelly vs Earl Meekins / Darren Jones1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Washo vs Dreu Fontenot6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEmmett Avery / Rich McDaniel vs Jay Munya / Thomas Webb1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJohn Cronly vs Heath Flohre4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRussell Moore / Edward Rider vs Lloyd Arnold / William Wilkins6-2, 6-3
2025-04-27vs 4.0 TDC Orioles-ShermanLost 23
W#1 DoublesRolf Welch / Rich McDaniel vs Scott Sorkin / Nick Bawa7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRussell Moore vs Evan Limoges1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlexander Schaaf / Edward Rider vs Timothy Sherman / Joe Basil3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Cronly vs Jeremy Theisen6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEmmett Avery / Danny MacNelly vs Boyd Collier / John Sweeney5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Rich McDaniel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
John Cronly
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Alexander Schaaf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Washo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Edward Rider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Russell Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Beau Pratt
published 4
3.61
Scott Harrison
published
3.33
Danny MacNelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Emmett Avery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Mason Antrim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Williamson
published
Rob Long
published
Rolf Welch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rich McDaniel
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
John Cronly
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Alexander Schaaf
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
David Washo
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Edward Rider
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Russell Moore
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Beau Pratt
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Scott Harrison
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
3.5
Danny MacNelly
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Michael Chapman
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Emmett Avery
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Mason Antrim
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Randy Williamson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Long
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rolf Welch
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.